MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/07334648261473324

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026

What Matters Most: A Qualitative Study Exploring Common Values Identified by Hospitalized Older Adults.

Satchidanand Nikhil, Wikerd Zachary B, Hobler Anna, LaDue Brittany, Lee Jihae

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BackgroundThe Age-Friendly Health System (AFHS) promotes better care by providing evidence-based guidance known as the "4 Ms"-Matters Most, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility. Using the "Matters Most" framework to assess older patients' values and preferences during hospitalization helps care teams individualize care approaches and align patients' healthcare needs and priorities. Having a better understanding of patients' values and preferences during hospitalization is important for improving care, outcomes, and patient satisfaction.ObjectiveIdentify and describe core themes related to "What Matters Most" to hospitalized older adults.MethodsWe implemented a qualitative descriptive study guided by five questions relating to patients' preferences for their current hospitalization among 70 older adults. Reflexive thematic analysis was performed to identify commonly occurring themes.ResultsFour themes were identified: mobility and independence, communication, respect, and shared decision-making, quality of life and treatment preferences and, family relationships and support.

Для цитирования: Satchidanand Nikhil, Wikerd Zachary B, Hobler Anna, LaDue Brittany, Lee Jihae. What Matters Most: A Qualitative Study Exploring Common Values Identified by Hospitalized Older Adults.. Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/07334648261473324.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.