Polski merkuriusz lekarski : organ Polskiego Towarzystwa Lekarskiego · 2026
Legal and bioethical aspects of euthanasia: A comparative analysis of international practice and the Ukrainian experience.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hololobova Kateryna O, Pletenetska Alina O, Halich Viktoriya-Svitlana M, Demchenko Ivan S, Kuzmenko Liudmyla A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Aim: To define the legal and bioethical aspects of the euthanasia problem in comparison with existing international practices and Ukrainian experience.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: A descriptive and comparative study of the regulatory frameworks of seven jurisdictions (2020-2026). A sociological survey (N=540) of healthcare workers and medical students at the Bogomolets National Medical University and the National Cancer Institute (2025) was conducted using an adapted End-of-Life Attitude Scale.
RESULTS: Results: The global legal trend of 2024-2026 is characterised by an expansion of criteria for access to euthanasia (France, the United Kingdom, Ecuador). The proportion of healthcare workers who categorically reject euthanasia was only 15.0% (95% CI: 12.2-18.3%). The level of rejection of euthanasia among believers (religious persons) (15.9%) did not statistically differ from that of non-believers (non-religious persons) (12.9%) (p=0.37).
CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The Ukrainian medical community demonstrates a significantly higher level of openness to discussing euthanasia (85.0%) than current conservative legislation assumes. Religious identity is not a statistically significant predictor of a negative attitude toward euthanasia. The results substantiate the need for legislative dialogue on palliative care and the right to a dignified end of life in Ukraine.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: A descriptive and comparative study of the regulatory frameworks of seven jurisdictions (2020-2026). A sociological survey (N=540) of healthcare workers and medical students at the Bogomolets National Medical University and the National Cancer Institute (2025) was conducted using an adapted End-of-Life Attitude Scale.
RESULTS: Results: The global legal trend of 2024-2026 is characterised by an expansion of criteria for access to euthanasia (France, the United Kingdom, Ecuador). The proportion of healthcare workers who categorically reject euthanasia was only 15.0% (95% CI: 12.2-18.3%). The level of rejection of euthanasia among believers (religious persons) (15.9%) did not statistically differ from that of non-believers (non-religious persons) (12.9%) (p=0.37).
CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The Ukrainian medical community demonstrates a significantly higher level of openness to discussing euthanasia (85.0%) than current conservative legislation assumes. Religious identity is not a statistically significant predictor of a negative attitude toward euthanasia. The results substantiate the need for legislative dialogue on palliative care and the right to a dignified end of life in Ukraine.