CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2025
Trigger Criteria for Advance Care Planning in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Possner Mathias, Schwitz Fabienne, Zach Niculin, Karrer Tanya, Tam James, Oechslin Erwin, Vonder Muhll Isabelle, Wolofsky Kayla, Birnie David, Beauchesne Luc, Mackie Andrew S, Schwerzmann Markus
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) face increased risks of premature morbidity and mortality. Advance care planning (ACP) facilitates longitudinal, patient-centered care but remains underused in this population, partly due to the lack of validated trigger criteria to initiate ACP. This study aimed to systematically review the literature to identify proposed triggers to initiate ACP conversations in adults with CHD.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to July 26, 2024. The search focused on 2 core concepts: CHD and adults, and ACP or palliative care. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion and extracted potential trigger criteria for ACP initiation.
RESULTS: Of 4257 articles screened, 21 were included for data extraction. Nearly half (48%) were published between 2020 and 2024, with most (81%) appearing in cardiology journals. ACP was most often recommended during routine follow-up (15 articles, 71%), independent of defect complexity or functional status. Specific interventions (10 articles, 48%) and signs of disease progression (10 articles, 48%) were the second most frequently cited trigger criteria, followed by defect-specific triggers (7 articles, 33%). Symptom- and patient-based triggers were less frequently reported.
CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights a wide range of proposed triggers and a lack of consensus on when to initiate ACP in adults with CHD. The identified triggers can inform clinical practice and serve as a foundation for developing standardized criteria. However, findings are limited by the heterogeneity among the included studies.
REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024597771.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to July 26, 2024. The search focused on 2 core concepts: CHD and adults, and ACP or palliative care. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion and extracted potential trigger criteria for ACP initiation.
RESULTS: Of 4257 articles screened, 21 were included for data extraction. Nearly half (48%) were published between 2020 and 2024, with most (81%) appearing in cardiology journals. ACP was most often recommended during routine follow-up (15 articles, 71%), independent of defect complexity or functional status. Specific interventions (10 articles, 48%) and signs of disease progression (10 articles, 48%) were the second most frequently cited trigger criteria, followed by defect-specific triggers (7 articles, 33%). Symptom- and patient-based triggers were less frequently reported.
CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights a wide range of proposed triggers and a lack of consensus on when to initiate ACP in adults with CHD. The identified triggers can inform clinical practice and serve as a foundation for developing standardized criteria. However, findings are limited by the heterogeneity among the included studies.
REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024597771.