MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3233/shti260900

Медицинская библиотека · Studies in health technology and informatics · 2026

Think-Reflect LLM: A Multi-Method Approach to Using Think Aloud Protocol Analysis and Prompted Reflections to Understand LLM Use.

Borycki Elizabeth M, Kushniruk Andre W

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Publicly available, large language models (LLMs) can enhance citizen management of their health and chronic illnesses, yet there are few research methods that can be used to understand the technology's impact upon cognitive processes such as information seeking, decision-making, problem solving and mental model development. Even less research has examined how these cognitive interactions influence subsequent use of the citizens socio-technical system which includes health services (e.g. regional health authorities), community services that support health (e.g. physiotherapy services, pharmacies), visits to health professionals (e.g. physicians, nurse practitioners or physiotherapists) and interactions with informal caregivers (e.g., family, friends). In this paper we outline a methodology we have developed to assess the impacts of LLMs on the cognitive and sociotechnical activities of their users which represents an integration of Think Aloud Protocols with Prompted Reflections called Think-Reflect LLM (TR-LLM). The methodology is described as well as key considerations for data collection and analysis.

Для цитирования: Borycki Elizabeth M, Kushniruk Andre W. Think-Reflect LLM: A Multi-Method Approach to Using Think Aloud Protocol Analysis and Prompted Reflections to Understand LLM Use.. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2026. DOI: 10.3233/shti260900.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.