JMIR formative research · 2026
An Evaluation of the Usability of ReACT (Responsive Asthma Care for Teens), an Adaptive Mobile Health Intervention for Adolescents With Asthma: Feasibility and Acceptability Trial.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cushing Christopher C, Leslie-Miller Calissa, Koskella-Staples Natalie, Ortega Adrian, Shcherbinin Helenna, Prabhakaran Shreekala, Fedele David A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Adolescent asthma is a significant contributor to youth morbidity and is known to be best managed through consistent medication use and symptom management. However, adolescents often struggle to perceive their symptoms accurately and consistently use their medication at the recommended rate, risking worsened symptoms and impaired quality of life. The Responsive Asthma Care for Teens (ReACT) system is a project aimed at identifying and and providing supporting for several barriers adolescents may face in asthma management. By integrating both software and hardware to monitor medication adherence, ReACT provides a personalized support plan to improve asthma management and, subsequently, quality of life.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to conduct a proof-of-concept assessment of the ReACT system following an initial pilot study and adjusting for the feedback received. In addition to assessing the acceptability and usability of the current version, this study aims to assess whether the proposed ReACT system leads to indications of improvement in medication adherence because of the personalized support plans.
METHODS: Participants in the study were 5 adolescents aged 15 to 17 years recruited using a combination of consent-to-contact forms delivered via an in-person asthma clinic and Qualtrics panels. As a part of this study, participants met with the study team 3 times over 1 month. After completing initial surveys on stress, problem-solving, and asthma-related quality of life, we oriented the participants to the ReACT platform and asked them to interact with it as normal. After the month, the participants were interviewed, and they discussed the system and completed surveys assessing their opinions on acceptability and usability.
RESULTS: On a 4-point scale, participants reported high acceptability of ReACT (mean score 3, SD 0.32), willingness to use it again (mean score 4, SD 0.89), and willingness to recommend it to a friend (mean score 3.75, SD 0.55), and they considered it to be helpful (mean score 3.2, SD 0.84).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that ReACT is an acceptable and usable mobile health intervention to improve asthma self-management among adolescents, and it had promising results for improving self-regulation, problem-solving, and asthma control. The system continues improving based on feedback from a larger sample size of participants, and we hope that ReACT will aid adolescent development while delivering highly personalized support for each user.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to conduct a proof-of-concept assessment of the ReACT system following an initial pilot study and adjusting for the feedback received. In addition to assessing the acceptability and usability of the current version, this study aims to assess whether the proposed ReACT system leads to indications of improvement in medication adherence because of the personalized support plans.
METHODS: Participants in the study were 5 adolescents aged 15 to 17 years recruited using a combination of consent-to-contact forms delivered via an in-person asthma clinic and Qualtrics panels. As a part of this study, participants met with the study team 3 times over 1 month. After completing initial surveys on stress, problem-solving, and asthma-related quality of life, we oriented the participants to the ReACT platform and asked them to interact with it as normal. After the month, the participants were interviewed, and they discussed the system and completed surveys assessing their opinions on acceptability and usability.
RESULTS: On a 4-point scale, participants reported high acceptability of ReACT (mean score 3, SD 0.32), willingness to use it again (mean score 4, SD 0.89), and willingness to recommend it to a friend (mean score 3.75, SD 0.55), and they considered it to be helpful (mean score 3.2, SD 0.84).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that ReACT is an acceptable and usable mobile health intervention to improve asthma self-management among adolescents, and it had promising results for improving self-regulation, problem-solving, and asthma control. The system continues improving based on feedback from a larger sample size of participants, and we hope that ReACT will aid adolescent development while delivering highly personalized support for each user.