Journal of family violence · 2026
Substance Use-Related Social Reactions to Sexual Assault Disclosures: Results from Survivor - Informal Support Dyadic Qualitative Interviews.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ullman Sarah E, Peja Teuta, Harris Casey, O'Callaghan Erin, Canadas Veronica
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Ample research exists on social reactions to sexual assault (SA) disclosure from the survivor perspective, yet dyadic data with their informal supports remains scarce, particularly for substance-related social reactions.
METHOD: The present study of 15 survivor-informal support dyads using interview data addresses this gap and examines how three relationship types: significant others (i.e., romantic partners), family, and friends differ in social reactions to substance-related SAs.
RESULTS: Results show that alcohol/drug's role in assaults entails a mixture of social reactions from informal support providers (SP) towards survivors, including positive reactions where SPs affirmed that the drinking and/or assault were not the survivor's fault, mixed reactions where SPs changed their perspective from initial blame to later realizing their response was wrong and becoming more supportive, and negative social reactions where SPs blamed victims for drinking/drug use.
CONCLUSIONS: Education and training are needed to improve SPs' ability to avoid negative reactions to substance-involved assaults and increase their ability to recognize and communicate that such assaults are not the victim's fault.
METHOD: The present study of 15 survivor-informal support dyads using interview data addresses this gap and examines how three relationship types: significant others (i.e., romantic partners), family, and friends differ in social reactions to substance-related SAs.
RESULTS: Results show that alcohol/drug's role in assaults entails a mixture of social reactions from informal support providers (SP) towards survivors, including positive reactions where SPs affirmed that the drinking and/or assault were not the survivor's fault, mixed reactions where SPs changed their perspective from initial blame to later realizing their response was wrong and becoming more supportive, and negative social reactions where SPs blamed victims for drinking/drug use.
CONCLUSIONS: Education and training are needed to improve SPs' ability to avoid negative reactions to substance-involved assaults and increase their ability to recognize and communicate that such assaults are not the victim's fault.