Environment international · 2026
Exposure to built and social environments and momentary well-being: A geographic ecological momentary assessment study in Montreal.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khezri Sadun, Thierry Benoît, Fuller Daniel, Winters Meghan, Kanning Martina, Geneidy Ahmed El, Kestens Yan
Аннотация
Understanding how built and social environments shape momentary well-being is essential for advancing urban health research and planning. This study investigated temporal, social, and environmental predictors of daily well-being using a geographic ecological momentary assessment (GEMA) approach. Seven-day GEMA measures were collected between 2018 and 2021 among 889 residents of Greater Montreal, recruited through the INTERACT and REM studies. Participants (mean age = 41.7 years; age range = 18-80 years; 55.7% women) completed the Short Mood Scale three times daily via the EthicaData smartphone app, yielding over 10,600 prompts linked with GPS data. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to assess the associations between well-being and temporal, social, and environmental exposures. Well-being varied significantly across time and contexts (conditional R2 ≈ 0.6). Higher well-being was reported in the afternoon (β = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.03-0.43) and on weekends, particularly Sundays (β = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.74-1.49), whereas evenings were associated with lower well-being (β = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.52 to -0.10). Social interactions, especially with friends (β = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.26-2.67) and family (β = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.42-1.25), were strongly associated with higher well-being. Built environment features, including greenness, proximity to parks, and road density, showed limited associations. Older adults (60-80 years) reported substantially higher well-being than younger (18-40) adults (β = 4.31, 95% CI: 3.44-5.18). An interaction indicated that women reported lower well-being than men when surrounded by others without direct interaction (β = -0.66, 95% CI: -1.17 to -0.09). Temporal rhythms, age, and social interactions were central determinants of momentary well-being, while built environment factors played a lesser role. Integrating GEMA approaches provides robust evidence to inform urban planning and public health strategies that promote supportive social and temporal environments.