Journal of psychosocial oncology · 2025
Interpersonal impacts of cancer diagnosis and treatment: A mixed methods study among young adult cancer survivors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dennis Kyla, Arem Hannah, McCready Darcey M, Howlader Afrah, Shajan Sheena, Bhanot Palash, Shaffer Lillian, Schubel Laura C, Berg Carla J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study examined cancer-related disruptions to family, friend, and intimate relationships, as well as fertility/reproduction, and related implications regarding hope among young adults.
METHODS: We analyzed data from young adult survivors (ages 18-39) who participated in: 1) qualitative interviews (April-July, 2023; n = 23) regarding cancer's social/reproductive impacts; and 2) surveys (February-September, 2024; n = 155) assessing quality of life (FACT-G and PROMIS) and hope.
RESULTS: Interview themes included cancer's impacts on: relationships with friends/family (increased prioritization of family/relationships, unanticipated reconnections, role disruption, others not relating or providing support); intimate relationships (importance of spouses/partners, disclosure to potential partners); and reproduction (family planning disruptions). Multivariable linear regression models indicated that higher scores on FACT-G social well-being and PROMIS participating in social roles/activities were associated with higher hope, adjusting for covariates and other quality of life measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions for this population targeting hope and navigating social relationships/roles may enhance quality of life.
METHODS: We analyzed data from young adult survivors (ages 18-39) who participated in: 1) qualitative interviews (April-July, 2023; n = 23) regarding cancer's social/reproductive impacts; and 2) surveys (February-September, 2024; n = 155) assessing quality of life (FACT-G and PROMIS) and hope.
RESULTS: Interview themes included cancer's impacts on: relationships with friends/family (increased prioritization of family/relationships, unanticipated reconnections, role disruption, others not relating or providing support); intimate relationships (importance of spouses/partners, disclosure to potential partners); and reproduction (family planning disruptions). Multivariable linear regression models indicated that higher scores on FACT-G social well-being and PROMIS participating in social roles/activities were associated with higher hope, adjusting for covariates and other quality of life measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions for this population targeting hope and navigating social relationships/roles may enhance quality of life.