MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/02692163261428947

Медицинская библиотека · Palliative medicine · 2026

A randomized controlled clinical trial of intranasal versus subcutaneous midazolam for agitation in terminal illness (MinTU study).

Hirschinger Hanna, Rémi Constanze, Jäger Evelyn, Nittka Stefanie, Hetjens Svetlana, Saussele Susanne, Merx Kirsten, Koch Jan, Abba Mohammed, Ghazal Mahmoud, Hofheinz Ralf-D, Michaeli Thomas, Sperk Elena, Kohlbrenner Katharina, Hofmann Wolf-K, Gencer Deniz, Boch Tobias

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеКлиническое исследование II фазыСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Terminally ill patients often have difficulty taking medications. Suitable, minimally invasive, fast-acting administration routes are particularly important. Trials on alternative drug administration routes in palliative care are essential to base therapy decisions on evidence rather than experience.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of intranasal compared with subcutaneous midazolam for the initial management of terminal agitation in palliative care patients.

DESIGN

Randomized, investigator-initiated open-label phase-II trial, August 2022-July 2024.

SETTING/

PARTICIPANTS

Monocentric trial at the palliative care ward of a German University Hospital. 180 patients were assessed for suitability, 60 patients (median age, 68 years (SD 12.3), 26 female) were randomized 1:1 and analyzed. Patients with terminal agitation fulfilling all eligibility criteria were randomized to midazolam 5 mg administered either intranasal (n = 30) or subcutaneous (n = 30).

PRIMARY OUTCOME: Improvement of terminal agitation by midazolam administration assessed by RASS-PAL-score.

SECONDARY OUTCOME: Midazolam plasma concentrations after administration.

RESULTS

Median RASS-PAL-scores decreased significantly in both groups. Intranasal group: 2 at baseline, to -1 at 5 min and -2 at 20 min. Subcutaneous group: 1,-0 and -1. Within-group reductions exceeded the clinically relevant threshold of ⩾ 1 point at 5 and 20 min (all p < 0.0001). Median midazolam plasma concentrations were significantly higher intranasal (5 min: 90 ng/ml, 20 min: 83 ng/ml) than subcutaneous (5 min: 15 ng/ml, 20 min: 24 ng/ml). No patients withdrawn due to adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Midazolam intranasal administration was effective in reducing terminal agitation and achieves higher plasma concentrations compared to subcutaneous administration. It is an alternative route of application to improve end-of-life care for terminally ill patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: MinTU Study 173-01, Eudra CT No.: 2021-004789-36, DRKS ID: 00026775 (07.07.2022, https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00026775).

Для цитирования: Hirschinger Hanna, Rémi Constanze, Jäger Evelyn, Nittka Stefanie, Hetjens Svetlana, Saussele Susanne, Merx Kirsten, Koch Jan, Abba Mohammed, Ghazal Mahmoud, Hofheinz Ralf-D, Michaeli Thomas, Sperk Elena, Kohlbrenner Katharina, Hofmann Wolf-K, Gencer Deniz, Boch Tobias. A randomized controlled clinical trial of intranasal versus subcutaneous midazolam for agitation in terminal illness (MinTU study).. Palliative medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/02692163261428947.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.