Standards for reporting research methods, interventions, and Outcomes in Surgical Prehabilitation studies (SOS-Prehab).
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gillis Chelsia, McIsaac Daniel I, Santa Mina Daniel, Chevalier Stéphanie, Baldini Gabriele, Carli Francesco, Scheede-Bergdahl Celena, Edgar Linda, Smrk Vanessa, Avery Leah, Bessissow Amal, Coca Martinez Miquel, Copeland Robert, Dalton Susanne Oksbjerg, Danjoux Gerad, Denehy Linda, Engel Dominique, Grimmett Chloe, Grocott Michael P, Gill Heather L, Jack Sandy, Jensen Bente Thoft, Levett Denny, Martinez-Palli Graciela, Merchant Zoe, Moore John, Pecorelli Nicolò, Randall Ian, Riedel Bernhard, Schierbeck Geoff, Slooter Gerrit, West Malcolm, Fiore Julio F, Collaborators
Аннотация
METHODS: A modified two-round Delphi process using the EQUATOR framework with 53 international experts across exercise, nutrition, psychological, and perioperative care disciplines was conducted. An initial checklist of candidate items was adapted from existing reporting standards, contextualized for prehabilitation, and iteratively refined through expert voting. Items rated eight to nine on a nine-point scale by ≥70% of participants in round two were classified as 'essential' and those rated seven were considered 'important'.
RESULTS: The final checklist comprised 40 items. Sixteen items were classified as 'essential' and 24 items were classified as 'important' for guiding comprehensive reporting of prehabilitation interventions. These items span key domains including intervention components, delivery methods, adherence, participant characteristics, and outcome measures. High agreement among experts underscores the checklist's relevance and usability.
CONCLUSION: Adoption of Standards for reporting research methods, interventions, and Outcomes in Surgical Prehabilitation studies (SOS-Prehab), alongside methodological and outcome-reporting items of CONSORT could improve transparency, completeness, and interpretability of prehabilitation trials. This could enable better reproducibility, robust evidence synthesis, and accelerate translation into clinical practice and policy.