Child and adolescent mental health · 2025
"All that I've been through has made me who I am": youth conceptualisations of personal recovery in mental health.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Anderson Linda, Dallinger Vicki C, Krishnamoorthy Govind, du Plessis Carol, Pillai-Sasidharan Arun, Ayres Alice, Waters Lillian, Groom Yasmin, Rees Bronwyn, Slade Mike, Gildersleeve Jessica, Burton Lorelle, Ireland Renee
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Youth is a transitional period from 15 to 24 years involving developmental milestones that may be adversely affected by mental health (MH) concerns. Clinical interventions tend to focus on the reduction or cure of illness-based psychiatric symptoms. However, national and international mental policy focuses on promoting well-being and self-management through personal recovery. The leading framework of personal recovery in adults is CHIME, an acronym used to denote five key processes - Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning and Empowerment. The extent to which CHIME reflects the experience of personal recovery in youth is under-researched, yet the framework often underpins youth mental health services.
METHOD: The present study uses a qualitative methodology to analyse interviews with 16 youth referred for treatment. Interviews focused on the lived experiences of youth recovery and its alignment with the CHIME processes and were analysed using a hybrid inductive and deductive reflexive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: The CHIME framework was relevant to youth recovery in two ways: restoring what was perceived to be lost (restorative processes) and encouraging resilience (resilience processes). Adaptations to the CHIME framework for youth included an increased emphasis on the role of family and friends, support for grieving processes and support for identity formation during the recovery journey.
CONCLUSION: An adapted CHIME framework for youth can underpin targeted recovery-oriented care to support youth in moving towards emerging adulthood successfully while managing mental health concerns.
METHOD: The present study uses a qualitative methodology to analyse interviews with 16 youth referred for treatment. Interviews focused on the lived experiences of youth recovery and its alignment with the CHIME processes and were analysed using a hybrid inductive and deductive reflexive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: The CHIME framework was relevant to youth recovery in two ways: restoring what was perceived to be lost (restorative processes) and encouraging resilience (resilience processes). Adaptations to the CHIME framework for youth included an increased emphasis on the role of family and friends, support for grieving processes and support for identity formation during the recovery journey.
CONCLUSION: An adapted CHIME framework for youth can underpin targeted recovery-oriented care to support youth in moving towards emerging adulthood successfully while managing mental health concerns.