Women's health (London, England) · 2025
Only private life settings positively affect quality of life of French women general practitioners.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sabatier Thibaut, Blanchemaison Julia, Ladner Joël, Cailleaux Pierre-Emmanuel
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In France, as women now represent the majority of the medical population, there is a discrepancy in the expected life mode for general practitioners and current society standards in a profession with excess of burnout and suicides. To date, there is only a few data available on the evaluation of quality of life of women general practitioner in France.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate quality of life among this population, and to identify associated factors.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Participants were women general practitioners practicing in France. Our questionnaire was based on the World Health Organization - quality of life-BREF (26-item). The questionnaire was distributed through various professional networks. This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. Both simple and multivariable linear models were developed with sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS: Upon 984 respondent women (mean age 36.2 ± 6.3), 704 (71.5%) were in private practice, 198 (20.1%) were employed and 82 (8.4%) had a mixed practice. They were mostly in couple (90.4%) with at least one child (73.6%). The number of working days and working hours depended on the practice type (p < 0.01). The average World Health Organization - quality of life was 63.0 ± 12.5, 66.2 ± 15.4 for domain 1 (physical), 62.6 ± 15.2 for domain 2 (psychological), 57.7 ± 19.6 for domain 3 (social) and 65.4 ± 13.4 for domain 4 (environment). No significant differences were observed in the global score or across the four domains according to the type of practice. Variables associated with the World Health Organization - quality of life were age (p < 0.01), daily working hours (p = 0.16), numbers of working days per month (p < 0.01), tobacco use (p = 0.11), presence of a secretary (p = 0.14), frequency of socializing with friends (p < 0.01), leisure time availability (p < 0.01), children (p = 0.04), relationship status (p < 0.01), number of weeks of vacations per year (p = 0.15), area of practice (p = 0.15) and place of residence (p = 0.06). After the multivariable model analysis, being in a couple (p = 0.02), having children (p = 0.03), leisure time availability (p < 0.001) and frequent socialization with friends (p < 0.001) were the remaining variables positively associated with the World Health Organization - quality of life. Advance in age (p = 0.002) and tobacco use (p = 0.04) were negatively associated to the World Health Organization - quality of life scores.
CONCLUSION: The weight of private life settings appears more important in quality of life assessment in women general practitioners rather than professional settings.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate quality of life among this population, and to identify associated factors.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Participants were women general practitioners practicing in France. Our questionnaire was based on the World Health Organization - quality of life-BREF (26-item). The questionnaire was distributed through various professional networks. This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. Both simple and multivariable linear models were developed with sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS: Upon 984 respondent women (mean age 36.2 ± 6.3), 704 (71.5%) were in private practice, 198 (20.1%) were employed and 82 (8.4%) had a mixed practice. They were mostly in couple (90.4%) with at least one child (73.6%). The number of working days and working hours depended on the practice type (p < 0.01). The average World Health Organization - quality of life was 63.0 ± 12.5, 66.2 ± 15.4 for domain 1 (physical), 62.6 ± 15.2 for domain 2 (psychological), 57.7 ± 19.6 for domain 3 (social) and 65.4 ± 13.4 for domain 4 (environment). No significant differences were observed in the global score or across the four domains according to the type of practice. Variables associated with the World Health Organization - quality of life were age (p < 0.01), daily working hours (p = 0.16), numbers of working days per month (p < 0.01), tobacco use (p = 0.11), presence of a secretary (p = 0.14), frequency of socializing with friends (p < 0.01), leisure time availability (p < 0.01), children (p = 0.04), relationship status (p < 0.01), number of weeks of vacations per year (p = 0.15), area of practice (p = 0.15) and place of residence (p = 0.06). After the multivariable model analysis, being in a couple (p = 0.02), having children (p = 0.03), leisure time availability (p < 0.001) and frequent socialization with friends (p < 0.001) were the remaining variables positively associated with the World Health Organization - quality of life. Advance in age (p = 0.002) and tobacco use (p = 0.04) were negatively associated to the World Health Organization - quality of life scores.
CONCLUSION: The weight of private life settings appears more important in quality of life assessment in women general practitioners rather than professional settings.