Journal of pain and symptom management · 2026
Identifying Key Components of Neuropalliative Care Fellowship Using Nominal Group Technique.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gianchandani Sachi Y, Jiao Jocelyn M, Adjepong Kwame O, Leavell Yaowaree L, Besbris Jessica M, Kramer Neha M, Phillips Joel N, Vermilion Paul M
Аннотация
CONTEXT: There is no standardized curriculum for neurology-focused palliative care training.
OBJECTIVE: To identify key components of fellowship training in neuropalliative care, via expert consensus.
METHODS: An adapted nominal group technique (NGT) was used to collect and rank responses to two key questions: "In designing the ideal dedicated neuropalliative care clinician training experience, what core components should be included?" and "When a general palliative care fellowship has a neurologist in their program, how could the program/program director potentially tailor the year to their unique needs?" The adapted NGT followed a structured process composed of silent generation, collection and clarification, ranking, discussion, and final survey.
RESULTS: Fourteen individuals participated, including two current trainees, eight early-career clinicians, and four late-career clinicians. Nine were board certified in neurology, two were board certified in child neurology, and ten had completed a palliative care fellowship. For both key questions, the top-ranked responses included: dedicated outpatient neuropalliative care experience, mentorship from faculty with expertise in neuropalliative care, and a core didactic curriculum that includes neurology-specific content. Additionally, appropriateness for certification in hospice and palliative medicine was identified as crucial.
CONCLUSION: Participants identified experiences that are critical to palliative care fellowship training for neurologists.
OBJECTIVE: To identify key components of fellowship training in neuropalliative care, via expert consensus.
METHODS: An adapted nominal group technique (NGT) was used to collect and rank responses to two key questions: "In designing the ideal dedicated neuropalliative care clinician training experience, what core components should be included?" and "When a general palliative care fellowship has a neurologist in their program, how could the program/program director potentially tailor the year to their unique needs?" The adapted NGT followed a structured process composed of silent generation, collection and clarification, ranking, discussion, and final survey.
RESULTS: Fourteen individuals participated, including two current trainees, eight early-career clinicians, and four late-career clinicians. Nine were board certified in neurology, two were board certified in child neurology, and ten had completed a palliative care fellowship. For both key questions, the top-ranked responses included: dedicated outpatient neuropalliative care experience, mentorship from faculty with expertise in neuropalliative care, and a core didactic curriculum that includes neurology-specific content. Additionally, appropriateness for certification in hospice and palliative medicine was identified as crucial.
CONCLUSION: Participants identified experiences that are critical to palliative care fellowship training for neurologists.