Remote and rural communities face inequalities in access to specialist palliative care, could telemedicine enhance care? A qualitative study of patient, carer and healthcare professionals' experiences of video consultation.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Living in remote and rural areas is associated with worse health outcomes and poorer end-of-life care. Inequality in access to high-quality palliative care due to rurality is a worldwide problem. There is a need to evaluate potential ways, such as using telemedicine, to enhance palliative care and support patients to remain within their communities.
OBJECTIVE
To understand the experiences of patients, carers and specialist palliative care professionals to receive/deliver video consultations in a rural setting.
DESIGN
Qualitative semi-structured interviews with reflective thematic analysis.
METHODS
Patients, their informal carers (family/friend) and members of the community specialist palliative care team were invited to qualitative interview to explore their experience of using video consultations.
RESULTS
Four themes were generated including: (1) interpersonal communication, (2) enhanced provision with subthemes: physical distance and reducing travel and quick and convenient access to care, (3) flexible blended models of care and (4) organisational and practical barriers.
CONCLUSION
In many situations, video consultations were felt to be beneficial to enable convenient and reliable access to specialist palliative care for patients living remotely. They are feasible, acceptable and practical for patients, their families and healthcare professionals. However, video consultations must be offered as an option to enhance care rather than replace in-person home visits, which are required in some situations. Further research is needed to explore how to ensure this increased accessibility is inclusive and supports disadvantaged older patients and those of lower socio-economic position.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.