DOI 10.1186/s12883-026-04698-8
Disease trajectories and end of life care in a Norwegian ALS cohort.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
This retrospective cohort study aims to provide comprehensive data on the disease trajectory and end-of-life care in patients dying from ALS.
METHODS
The study presents detailed information on a cohort dying from ALS in the area served by Akershus University Hospital from 2011 to 2022. Data was obtained from the patient medical records.
RESULTS
118 patients were included. 65 patients (55%) were referred to the Department of Palliative medicine for specialist palliative care, with a median duration from referral to death of two months and one third of patients not being able to communicate verbally at the time of referral. The most common life-sustaining treatment was non-invasive ventilation and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, whereas most prevalent limitation of life-sustaining treatment was withholding of tracheostomy with invasive ventilation. Hospital was the most common place of death with 54 (46%) of all deaths. For in-hospital-deaths, the most common place of death was the palliative care ward, with 21 patients (39%), but a substantial proportion (17%) died at intensive or intermediate care units. Overall, 37% of in-hospital deaths had been admitted to either intensive or intermediate care units during their last week of life, which may suggest these patients deteriorated rapidly without having documented advanced care planning and therefore received resource demanding and futile treatment during the last week of life.
CONCLUSION
Many patients lived in their own homes until admitted to their last hospital stay in life. However, these last hospital stays were frequently characterized by insufficient advanced care planning, leading to futile overtreatment.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.