Associations between Smoking, Opioid Analgesic Use, and Risk For Chemical Coping in Korean Patients with Advanced Cancer.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We investigated the associations between smoking, pain expression, opioid use, substance use behaviors, coping strategies, and risk of chemical coping in Korean patients with advanced cancer.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
In this prospective study, 240 patients were enrolled. Demographic and clinical information were obtained from medical records. Smoking status, symptom burden by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), the Cut down/Annoyed/Guilty/Eye-opener (CAGE) alcoholism questionnaire results, morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD), tranquilizers and coffee use, coping strategies, and physician-assessed risk of chemical coping and somatization were assessed using questionnaires and interviews.
RESULTS
Of the 240 patients, 49 (20.4%) were current smokers, 104 (43.3%) were former smokers, and 87 (36.3%) were never-smokers. 161 were male (67.1%); 89.4% (144/161) of these men were current or former smokers, while 88.6% (70/79) of women were never-smokers (p<0.001). ESAS pain scores did not differ by smoking status (3.0 vs. 2.9 vs. 2.7, p=0.480), but current smokers had higher MEDD (63.5 mg/day vs. 25.1 mg/day vs. 22.3 mg/day, p=0.015). Current smokers were more often CAGE-positive (32.7% vs. 16.3% vs. 2.3%, p<0.001), heavy coffee drinkers (24.5% vs. 12.5% vs. 0%, p<0.001) and showed a greater physician-assessed risk of chemical coping (26.5% vs. 8.7% vs. 13.8%, p=0.015).
CONCLUSION
Among Korean patients with advanced cancer, current smokers were more likely to use higher doses of opioids, have positive CAGE results, and drink more coffee. Close monitoring and appropriate management for the possibility of chemical coping or non-medical opioid use will be important in these patients.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.