EClinicalMedicine · 2025
The inverse palliative care law in advanced lung disease: a mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wakefield Donna, Dehpour Tara, Bambra Clare, Davies Joanna, Murtagh Fliss E M, Koffman Jonathan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: People from socioeconomically deprived backgrounds are at greater risk of developing lung disease and having a higher symptom burden. It remains unclear whether they have equitable access to and experience of palliative care. Therefore, we aimed to synthesise evidence on socioeconomic inequalities in access, receipt of, preference for, and experience of palliative care among people with advanced lung disease.
METHODS: Mixed-methods systematic review, searching four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL) from inception to March 28, 2025. We included studies that reported on socioeconomic position and palliative care in advanced lung disease (lung cancer, mesothelioma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease). Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Both meta-analysis (using a random effects model with I2 to assess heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis and GRADE of evidence) and narrative synthesis were performed. PROSPERO CRD42024546502.
FINDINGS: Of 10,572 records, 54 studies met inclusion criteria (4.2 million participants). Meta-analysis of six studies showed people with lung cancer in the lowest SEP group were 18% less likely to receive palliative care than those in the highest (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.90, I2 = 93.9%). GRADE of evidence was assessed as moderate. Qualitative findings identified financial hardship and insurance barriers limited access to pain relief and oxygen. Few studies considered multiple demographic characteristics, but those that did reported worse access among ethnic minorities and rural populations.
INTERPRETATION: This review provides novel evidence of how the inverse care law operates in advanced lung disease. People from lower socioeconomic groups are significantly less likely to access palliative care, despite greater need. There is an urgent need for equity-focused research and policy interventions, co-produced with underserved communities that account for intersecting social disadvantages.
FUNDING: National Institute for Health and Care Research.
METHODS: Mixed-methods systematic review, searching four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL) from inception to March 28, 2025. We included studies that reported on socioeconomic position and palliative care in advanced lung disease (lung cancer, mesothelioma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease). Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Both meta-analysis (using a random effects model with I2 to assess heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis and GRADE of evidence) and narrative synthesis were performed. PROSPERO CRD42024546502.
FINDINGS: Of 10,572 records, 54 studies met inclusion criteria (4.2 million participants). Meta-analysis of six studies showed people with lung cancer in the lowest SEP group were 18% less likely to receive palliative care than those in the highest (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.90, I2 = 93.9%). GRADE of evidence was assessed as moderate. Qualitative findings identified financial hardship and insurance barriers limited access to pain relief and oxygen. Few studies considered multiple demographic characteristics, but those that did reported worse access among ethnic minorities and rural populations.
INTERPRETATION: This review provides novel evidence of how the inverse care law operates in advanced lung disease. People from lower socioeconomic groups are significantly less likely to access palliative care, despite greater need. There is an urgent need for equity-focused research and policy interventions, co-produced with underserved communities that account for intersecting social disadvantages.
FUNDING: National Institute for Health and Care Research.