Integrating Neurology, Palliative Care and Emergency Services in ALS: A Community-Integrated Neuropalliative Pathway in Modena, Italy.

BACKGROUND: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that causes severe motor, respiratory and communication impairment and imposes a high psychosocial burden on patients and families. Recent evidence shows that integrated neuropalliative care-early collaboration between neurology and palliative services with community support-improves quality of life and reduces avoidable hospitalisations. Yet there are few descriptions of how such integration is operationalised.

OBJECTIVE: This study examines a Community-Integrated Neuropalliative Pathway (CINP) implemented in the province of Modena (Emilia-Romagna, Italy), analysing how neurology, palliative care and emergency services collaborate to provide continuous, person-centred care for people with ALS.

METHODS: A single, holistic case study was conducted following Yin's analytical approach. Data sources included ten semi-structured interviews with neurologists, palliative physicians, nurses, home-care professionals and emergency clinicians; ethnographic observations in the ALS outpatient clinic; relevant organisational documents (the regional Clinical Pathway on ALS); and aggregated quantitative data from the palliative care registry (January 2023-December 2024). Thematic analysis with investigator triangulation was used to explore care integration, advance care planning and emergency coordination. Quantitative data were summarised descriptively.

RESULTS: Three interrelated themes were identified: (1) Progressive and flexible integration between neurology and palliative care. Neurologists remained longitudinal reference points while palliative teams were activated in response to evolving needs and became more relevant with the progression of the disease. Regular multidisciplinary meetings and shared discharge planning facilitated coordination. (2) The shared culture of advance care planning. Professionals framed advance care planning (ACP) as a relational, iterative process anchored in therapeutic relationships. Shared care plans, once completed, triggered an electronic Emergency Warning ("warning 118") procedure that notified the emergency service of patient preferences. (3) The integration of palliative and emergency services. The warning system enabled emergency clinicians to respect care plans and avoid aggressive interventions during crises. Quantitative data on 47 ALS patients followed by territorial palliative services showed that 16 had an active Emergency Warning flag; among these, most died at home or in a hospice rather than in hospital.

CONCLUSIONS: The Modena CINP exemplifies how a public health system can operationalise early neuropalliative integration and connect hospital, community and emergency services. The qualitative findings illustrate the cultural and organisational shifts required for continuous care, while the quantitative data show that the system is correctly used and that patients with the Emergency Warning activation died mostly at home or in a hospice. Lessons from this analytical case study can inform the development of similar pathways in other regions, although further research is needed to assess outcomes in larger populations and such models need to be adapted to local contexts.