Role of Digital Health on Palliative Care: Umbrella Review.

BACKGROUND

Digital health (DH) provides a valuable opportunity for accessible and efficient palliative care delivery. In recent years, an expanding body of systematic reviews and meta-analyses has examined DH-based interventions in palliative care. However, their conclusions regarding effects remain inconsistent, often constrained by methodological limitations and the variable quality of primary studies, making it difficult to form a coherent appraisal.

OBJECTIVE

This umbrella review aimed to examine, appraise, and synthesize previous systematic reviews and evaluate the role of DH-based services on palliative care, and to identify barriers to using DH-based services in these settings.

METHODS

Systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis focusing on DH within palliative care settings were considered eligible. Seven electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wangfang, and VIP, were searched for eligible studies published from inception to April 2024. The inclusion criteria were identified based on the principles of the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study Type) framework. Two reviewers independently screened records and extracted data. Eligible studies were appraised for methodological quality using the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses. A narrative synthesis, supported by tabulated summaries of the results, was used in this umbrella review.

RESULTS

A total of 25 systematic reviews (4 with meta-analyses) published between 2012 and 2024 met our inclusion criteria, most of which were evaluated as moderate quality. Reported outcomes ranged from symptom management effectiveness to psycho-social burden (ie, mood, distress, and emotional well-being), quality of life, caregiver burden, decision-making, cost-effectiveness, communication, self-efficacy and self-management efficacy, resource use, family empowerment, and acceptability. The effect of DH-based interventions for palliative care was basically consistent, with all included reviews reporting either significant improvements or noninferiority of DH-based interventions as compared to usual care. Technical challenges, organizational factors, ethical concerns, resource constraints, nonverbal communication, and perceptions were considered as barriers to the use of DH-based services.

CONCLUSIONS

Across included reviews, DH was found to be beneficial or noninferior to standard care, with no reported adverse effects, supporting its safety and feasibility as a mode of service delivery. To ensure successful implementation and long-term sustainability, a multifaceted strategy is needed that integrates technological enhancements and training, organizational commitment, ethical safeguards, infrastructure development, and equitable access.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024539963; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024539963.