MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/bcp.70321

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025

Human vs. artificial intelligence: Physicians outperform ChatGPT in real-world pharmacotherapy counselling.

Krichevsky Benjamin, Engeli Stefan, Bode-Böger Stefanie M, Koop Felix, Schulze Westhoff Martin, Schröder Sebastian, Schumacher Carsten, Pape Thorben, Stichtenoth Dirk O, Heck Johannes

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIMS: To assess the utility of the artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot ChatGPT (openly available version 3.5) in responding to real-world pharmacotherapeutic queries from healthcare professionals.

METHODS

Three independent and blinded evaluators with different levels of medical expertise and professional experience (beginner, advanced, and expert) compared AI chatbot- and physician-generated responses to 70 real-world pharmacotherapeutic queries submitted to the clinical-pharmacological drug information centre of Hannover Medical School between June and October 2023 with regard to quality of information, answer preference, answer correctness and quality of language. Inter-rater reliability was assessed with Krippendorff's alpha. Two separate investigators not otherwise involved in the conduct or analysis of the study selected the top three clinically relevant errors in chatbot- and physician-generated responses.

RESULTS

All three evaluators rated the quality of information of physician-generated responses higher than the quality of information of AI chatbot-generated responses and, accordingly, thought that the physician-generated responses were better than the chatbot-generated responses (answer preference). All evaluators detected factually wrong information more frequently in chatbot-generated responses than in physician-generated responses. Although the beginner and expert evaluators rated the quality of language of physician-generated responses higher than the quality of language of chatbot-generated responses, there was no significant difference according to the advanced evaluator.

CONCLUSIONS

ChatGPT's responses to real-world pharmacotherapeutic queries were substantially inferior compared to conventional physician-generated responses with regard to quality of information and factual correctness. Our study suggests that to date it must be strongly cautioned against the use of ChatGPT in pharmacotherapy counselling.

Для цитирования: Krichevsky Benjamin, Engeli Stefan, Bode-Böger Stefanie M, Koop Felix, Schulze Westhoff Martin, Schröder Sebastian, Schumacher Carsten, Pape Thorben, Stichtenoth Dirk O, Heck Johannes. Human vs. artificial intelligence: Physicians outperform ChatGPT in real-world pharmacotherapy counselling.. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2025. DOI: 10.1002/bcp.70321.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.