MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/1742-6723.70034

Медицинская библиотека · Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2025

Evaluating the satisfaction of patients utilising the virtual emergency department service in southeast region of Melbourne.

Sri-Ganeshan Muhuntha, Harris Amanda, Thuring Christopher, O'Reilly Gerard, Mitra Biswadev, Underhill Andrew, Charteris Claire, Egerton-Warburton Diana, Cameron Peter A, Southeast Region Virtual Emergency Department (SERVED) Research Group

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate patient satisfaction with paramedic and residential aged care facility (RACF) staff-initiated tele-emergency care through the Southeast Melbourne Virtual ED.

METHODS

Patient satisfaction surveys were conducted across two of the constituent virtual EDs (VEDs).

RESULTS

Of 452 responses, 427 (94.5%) had no negative comments, with 341 (75.4%) rating the service 8 out of 10 or higher, and 83.4% would recommend the service to family or friends.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency telehealth services were favoured by patients, with ratings comparable to satisfaction scores in physical EDs. Upskilling of emergency clinicians for telehealth consultations and educational programmes could provide further improvements to patient experiences.

Для цитирования: Sri-Ganeshan Muhuntha, Harris Amanda, Thuring Christopher, O'Reilly Gerard, Mitra Biswadev, Underhill Andrew, Charteris Claire, Egerton-Warburton Diana, Cameron Peter A, Southeast Region Virtual Emergency Department (SERVED) Research Group. Evaluating the satisfaction of patients utilising the virtual emergency department service in southeast region of Melbourne.. Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA. 2025. DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.70034.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.