The Journal of surgical research · 2025
Effects of Early Palliative Care Involvement on More At-Risk Patients Undergoing Surgery for Cancer.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bryant Peter A, Orun Onur M, Raman Rameela, Shinall Myrick C
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Two recent clinical trials of patients undergoing nonpalliative surgery for abdominal malignancies found no benefit from early specialist palliative intervention. However, more at-risk patients may benefit from this intervention.
METHODS: This secondary, post-hoc exploratory analysis of data from one of these trials examines heterogeneity of treatment effect to identify at-risk subgroups of patients who benefit from early specialist palliative intervention. Regression models with interaction terms between treatment and age, frailty, and baseline values of patient reported outcomes (PROs) were used to examine heterogeneity of treatment effect for five PROs at 90 d postoperatively.
RESULTS: At alpha = 0.2, there was evidence of possible heterogeneity of treatment effect in six models: by age for the outcomes of physical and functional quality of life (P = 0.12), anxiety (P = 0.03), and depression (P = 0.01); by baseline PRO value for the outcomes of physical and functional quality of life (P = 0.04), anxiety (P = 0.19), and life space (P = 0.03). Graphical examination did not reveal a consistent pattern of more positive intervention effects for more at-risk patients.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no consistent pattern in heterogeneity of effect to suggest a particular subgroup benefitting from early specialist palliative intervention. This further supports the conclusion that the palliative care needs of these patients are met by their usual care teams.
METHODS: This secondary, post-hoc exploratory analysis of data from one of these trials examines heterogeneity of treatment effect to identify at-risk subgroups of patients who benefit from early specialist palliative intervention. Regression models with interaction terms between treatment and age, frailty, and baseline values of patient reported outcomes (PROs) were used to examine heterogeneity of treatment effect for five PROs at 90 d postoperatively.
RESULTS: At alpha = 0.2, there was evidence of possible heterogeneity of treatment effect in six models: by age for the outcomes of physical and functional quality of life (P = 0.12), anxiety (P = 0.03), and depression (P = 0.01); by baseline PRO value for the outcomes of physical and functional quality of life (P = 0.04), anxiety (P = 0.19), and life space (P = 0.03). Graphical examination did not reveal a consistent pattern of more positive intervention effects for more at-risk patients.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no consistent pattern in heterogeneity of effect to suggest a particular subgroup benefitting from early specialist palliative intervention. This further supports the conclusion that the palliative care needs of these patients are met by their usual care teams.