MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105876

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2025

Quality Indicators to Monitor Home Care Services for the Older Population: A Scoping Review.

Caughey Gillian E, Rahja Miia, Harrison Stephanie, Fernando Rangika, Inacio Maria C

СтатьяScoping ReviewПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To identify and synthesize publicly available quality indicators (QIs) routinely used to monitor and assess the quality and safety of home care services for the older population.

DESIGN

A scoping literature review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).

SETTING AND

PARTICIPANTS

Older people aged ≥65 years old receiving home care services.

METHODS

Academic and gray literature searches were conducted to identify publicly available QIs routinely used at the population level and reported since 2012. Identified QIs and programs were synthesized by domain, QI type, and dimension of quality. Data used to report QIs, risk adjustments, population, and reporting-related characteristics were also summarized.

RESULTS

A total of 226 individual QIs from 9 unique QI programs from 8 countries were identified. Of the QIs identified, 65% (n = 147) were outcome QIs, 30% (n = 68) were process, and 5% (n = 11) were structure QIs. The most common dimensions captured were effectiveness (40.3%, n = 91), followed by person-centeredness (30.5%, n = 69) and safety (19%, n = 43). The most common domain across programs included the provision of care and services received (specifically service delivery/care plans (77.8% programs, n = 7/9), wait times/system access (66.7%, n = 6/9), key outcomes for the older population essential to maintain independence and the ability to age in place [eg, fall/fractures and hospitalizations (both 66.7%, n = 6/9), function/activities of daily living (55.5%, n = 5/9), and quality of life and consumer experience (55.5%, n = 5/9)]. Standardized clinical data (40.3%, n = 91) was the most used data source to identify QIs. Six programs (66.7%) release public reporting online either at a provider level (n = 2) or at a national/regional level (n = 4).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Internationally, QIs to monitor and drive high-quality home care for the older population focus on the provision of care and services, key health outcomes, and consumer experience. These domains are critical to provide effective, safe, and person-centered high-quality home care to support older people to successfully age in place.

Для цитирования: Caughey Gillian E, Rahja Miia, Harrison Stephanie, Fernando Rangika, Inacio Maria C. Quality Indicators to Monitor Home Care Services for the Older Population: A Scoping Review.. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105876.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.