Ecancermedicalscience · 2025
Mapping the cancer research landscape across Zambia: evidence to support national cancer control planning.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Msadabwe Susan, Ng Peng Yun, Sullivan Richard, Lishimpi Kennedy, Kachimba John, Banda Justor, Mumba Jane, Chansa Abidan, Chiwele Mutuna, Bowa Kasonde, Chiyenu Kaseya, Malulu-Chiwele Linda, Torode Julie, Lewison Grant, Leather Andrew, Aggarwal Ajay, Schmeler Kathleen, Parham Groesbeck, Mwala Kabisa, Kamfwa Paul
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Zambia faces the double burden of rising cancer incidence and a disproportionate volume of mortality from delayed presentations. The Ministry of Health Zambia acknowledged cancer research as a key pillar of cancer control in the National Cancer Control Strategic Plan 2022-2026, but there remains a paucity of country-specific evidence to inform strategies, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of research activities. Our study aimed to map and critically analyse the existing cancer research landscape to inform national planning.
METHODS: We adopted a two-stage mixed-method research. First, we conducted a systematic review, including 76 Zambian cancer studies published between 2012 and 2022, adhering to PRISMA guidance. Second, we conducted an in-person modified consensus meeting in Ndola, Zambia attended by 31 domestic and international stakeholders, to co-develop priorities and strategies based on gaps and facilitators identified through the systematic review.
RESULTS: The year-on-year cancer research output in Zambia had risen and diversified beyond cervical cancer but prevention, palliative care and health economic studies were lacking. Delay in deciding to seek care was most studied (n = 17, 63.0%), especially in cervical cancer. Research activities were mostly retrospective (n = 47/76, 61.8%) with only one randomised controlled trial identified. Greater than 90% (n = 10/11, 90.9%) of the most prolific research funders were international, predominantly from the United States and the United Kingdom, and Zambian researchers were under-represented as first and last authors at 43% (n = 33/76) and 45% (n = 34/76), respectively. The existing national cervical cancer registry, active global collaboration and adoption of technology were facilitators to be leveraged to build research capacity through multi-level, stakeholder-specific strategies.
CONCLUSION: To strengthen research capacity, sustained commitment to priorities through the implementation of co-developed strategies is required at individual, organisational and institutional levels. This paradigm shift is necessary to deliver evidence-based cancer care tailored to the needs of Zambians with emphasis on value and quality.
METHODS: We adopted a two-stage mixed-method research. First, we conducted a systematic review, including 76 Zambian cancer studies published between 2012 and 2022, adhering to PRISMA guidance. Second, we conducted an in-person modified consensus meeting in Ndola, Zambia attended by 31 domestic and international stakeholders, to co-develop priorities and strategies based on gaps and facilitators identified through the systematic review.
RESULTS: The year-on-year cancer research output in Zambia had risen and diversified beyond cervical cancer but prevention, palliative care and health economic studies were lacking. Delay in deciding to seek care was most studied (n = 17, 63.0%), especially in cervical cancer. Research activities were mostly retrospective (n = 47/76, 61.8%) with only one randomised controlled trial identified. Greater than 90% (n = 10/11, 90.9%) of the most prolific research funders were international, predominantly from the United States and the United Kingdom, and Zambian researchers were under-represented as first and last authors at 43% (n = 33/76) and 45% (n = 34/76), respectively. The existing national cervical cancer registry, active global collaboration and adoption of technology were facilitators to be leveraged to build research capacity through multi-level, stakeholder-specific strategies.
CONCLUSION: To strengthen research capacity, sustained commitment to priorities through the implementation of co-developed strategies is required at individual, organisational and institutional levels. This paradigm shift is necessary to deliver evidence-based cancer care tailored to the needs of Zambians with emphasis on value and quality.