Palliative & supportive care · 2025
Healthcare professionals' experiences in using a patient-reported outcome tool (PRO-Pall) to identify symptoms and problems in palliative care: A mixed-methods study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ikander Tine, Bergenholtz Heidi, Sørensen Henriette, Paine Marie, Skytte Mikael, Refer Ida, Christensen Elise, Raunkiaer Mette, Egholm Cecilie
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate healthcare professionals' experiences with using the PRO Palliative Care questionnaire (PRO-Pall) to identify palliative care symptoms and problems in non-specialized palliative care settings among patients with heart, lung, and kidney disease, and cancer. The study also investigated the PRO-Pall's potential to ensure further initiatives and care.
METHODS: A national, multicenter, observational study employing a mixed-methods approach. It includes quantitative analysis using an evaluation survey (n = 286) and qualitative analysis from workshops (n = 11). Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically.
RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative data were organized according to 3 a priori-defined themes: Theme 1: Assessment of palliative symptoms, Theme 2: Support for dialogue, and Theme 3: Timely initiation of initiatives and care. The evaluation survey and qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals indicated that it was valuable to use PRO-Pall in a non-specialist palliative context to screen for symptoms and problems, as well as to initiate actions. PRO-Pall helped to structure the dialogue and had a positive effect on the quality of the conversation.
SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The findings highlight that it can be valuable to utilize the PRO-Pall in general palliative care settings for patients with heart, lung, or kidney diseases as well as cancer. When implementing PRO-Pall in practice, it is crucial to carefully consider the entire process, from administering the questionnaire to planning initiatives informed by patients' PRO responses.
METHODS: A national, multicenter, observational study employing a mixed-methods approach. It includes quantitative analysis using an evaluation survey (n = 286) and qualitative analysis from workshops (n = 11). Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically.
RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative data were organized according to 3 a priori-defined themes: Theme 1: Assessment of palliative symptoms, Theme 2: Support for dialogue, and Theme 3: Timely initiation of initiatives and care. The evaluation survey and qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals indicated that it was valuable to use PRO-Pall in a non-specialist palliative context to screen for symptoms and problems, as well as to initiate actions. PRO-Pall helped to structure the dialogue and had a positive effect on the quality of the conversation.
SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The findings highlight that it can be valuable to utilize the PRO-Pall in general palliative care settings for patients with heart, lung, or kidney diseases as well as cancer. When implementing PRO-Pall in practice, it is crucial to carefully consider the entire process, from administering the questionnaire to planning initiatives informed by patients' PRO responses.