Medicine · 2025
The impact of second-victim syndrome on staff well-being and practice.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alishaq Moza, Kamal Hassan Asmaa, Assar Ahmed H, Elfaki Somaia, Sobhi Mohamed Samia Mohmed, Abdelaliem Sally Mohammed Farghaly, Hassan Elkordy Mohammed
Аннотация
This study aimed to examine factors influencing psychological well-being and support among healthcare professionals involved in adverse event investigations, complaints, medical errors, and patient injuries from January 2020 to March 2022. The second-victim experience and support tool (SVEST) was used to assess second-victim experiences and support resources. Non-probability purposive sampling was employed, and data were collected through a Monkey Survey sent via email to around 150 clinicians (physicians, nurses, and pharmacists). A total of 100 responses were received. The inclusion criteria required participants to have been involved in adverse event investigations, complaints, medical errors, or patient-related injuries. The SVEST, with 29 items measured on a 5-point Likert scale, evaluated their perceptions of second-victim experiences and support resources. Institutional support was positively perceived by 55.0% of participants, with 52.0% feeling a range of coping resources was available. However, 31.0% felt their well-being was not adequately prioritized. Nonwork-related support was crucial, with 57.0% relying on friends and family. Professional self-efficacy was impacted, with 46.0% feeling inadequate and 39.0% experiencing self-doubt. Turnover intentions were notable, as 39.0% expressed a desire to leave patient care, and 34.0% considered quitting due to stress. This study highlights the need for targeted support systems to address second-victim experiences among healthcare professionals involved in adverse events. Enhancing institutional support, professional self-efficacy, and access to coping resources is crucial. Policymakers and healthcare leaders can help mitigate stress, decrease turnover intentions, and promote psychological resilience by fostering a supportive work environment and providing comprehensive resources, healthcare organizations can improve clinician well-being, reduce stress, and enhance patient care quality.