Kidney international reports · 2025
Economic Evaluation of System-Wide Implementation of Kidney Supportive Care.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brady Lisa L, Hutton Annie, Chapman Jeremy R, Duck Gerard, Gastrell Tessa, Makris Angela, McCarthy Dennis, Noel Michael, Hay Liz, Choi Peter
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: This evaluation explored the economic value of kidney supportive care (KSC) in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) receiving dialysis or conservative management for ESKD in the public health system of New South Wales, Australia.
METHODS: Deidentified patient-level data were extracted from a linked dataset of admitted and nonadmitted patient data, emergency department episodes, and death registrations. Data between 1 July 2015 and 30 June 2019 were compared with usual treatment prior to statewide KSC implementation in the 2015-2016 financial years. A cost-benefit analysis model estimated the current economic value of KSC (1 July 2015 to 30 June 2019) and projected value to 30 June 2030 under different scenarios.
RESULTS: The proportion of all patients with ESKD receiving KSC increased from 5% in 2015 to 2016 (n = 443) to 16% by 2018 to 2019. Over this period, KSC was estimated to increase survival by 3 to 21 weeks, depending on patient characteristics. Projections showed that continued delivery of KSC, with ESKD treatment modality patterns and costs remaining stable, would deliver a net economic benefit of A$ 109 million through avoided costs of care and return on investment (ROI) of 212%. When adjusted to include survival improvements attributable to KSC, the net economic benefit increased to A$ 275 million (ROI: 535%).
CONCLUSION: Economic evaluation of the statewide KSC service showed survival benefits and a net economic benefit 4 years after implementation. Net economic value over 10 years was estimated at A$ 275 million, which would increase with greater participation of patients with ESKD suitable for KSC.
METHODS: Deidentified patient-level data were extracted from a linked dataset of admitted and nonadmitted patient data, emergency department episodes, and death registrations. Data between 1 July 2015 and 30 June 2019 were compared with usual treatment prior to statewide KSC implementation in the 2015-2016 financial years. A cost-benefit analysis model estimated the current economic value of KSC (1 July 2015 to 30 June 2019) and projected value to 30 June 2030 under different scenarios.
RESULTS: The proportion of all patients with ESKD receiving KSC increased from 5% in 2015 to 2016 (n = 443) to 16% by 2018 to 2019. Over this period, KSC was estimated to increase survival by 3 to 21 weeks, depending on patient characteristics. Projections showed that continued delivery of KSC, with ESKD treatment modality patterns and costs remaining stable, would deliver a net economic benefit of A$ 109 million through avoided costs of care and return on investment (ROI) of 212%. When adjusted to include survival improvements attributable to KSC, the net economic benefit increased to A$ 275 million (ROI: 535%).
CONCLUSION: Economic evaluation of the statewide KSC service showed survival benefits and a net economic benefit 4 years after implementation. Net economic value over 10 years was estimated at A$ 275 million, which would increase with greater participation of patients with ESKD suitable for KSC.