Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
Timely integration of palliative care into oncology care for patients with bone metastases at the radiotherapy department: A pilot study on acceptability and feasibility.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van Oss Anouk, Stoppelenburg Arianne, de Nijs Ellen, van Jaarsveld Rebecca, Heipon Carly S, Raijmakers Natasja J H, van der Linden Yvette M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Patients with bone metastases may have needs that extend beyond the management of pain by radiotherapy. Concurrent palliative care leads to improved quality of life, but is often introduced late. In this pilot study, we assessed the acceptability and feasibility of an introdu0000ctory conversation with a palliative care consultant at referral for palliative radiotherapy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with bone metastases and their family caregivers were scheduled for an introductory conversation with a consultant from the hospital palliative care team. During this meeting, the potential benefits of integrating palliative care into their current or future care was discussed. Using statements on a 5-point Likert scale, patients and family caregivers independently evaluated the acceptability of the conversation, and consultants evaluated the feasibility.
RESULTS: Between December 2022 and March 2024, 48 patients were included in the study. Median age was 73 years, 63 % were male. Most patients (89 %) and family caregivers (96 %) appreciated the introductory conversation, were unaware of the existence of a palliative care team (60 %, 67 %, respectively), and would contact the team when having questions or concerns (77 %, 82 %). Some found the conversation confronting (17 %, 11 %), or felt it was too early in the illness trajectory (31 %, 26 %). Follow-up consultations were scheduled for 8 patients (17 %). Consultants were able to conduct the conversation as instructed (91 %), though 15 % indicated insufficient time for preparation.
CONCLUSION: Introductory conversations about palliative care at referral for palliative radiotherapy appear both acceptable and feasible, and may enhance timely integration of palliative care into oncology care for patients with bone metastases.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with bone metastases and their family caregivers were scheduled for an introductory conversation with a consultant from the hospital palliative care team. During this meeting, the potential benefits of integrating palliative care into their current or future care was discussed. Using statements on a 5-point Likert scale, patients and family caregivers independently evaluated the acceptability of the conversation, and consultants evaluated the feasibility.
RESULTS: Between December 2022 and March 2024, 48 patients were included in the study. Median age was 73 years, 63 % were male. Most patients (89 %) and family caregivers (96 %) appreciated the introductory conversation, were unaware of the existence of a palliative care team (60 %, 67 %, respectively), and would contact the team when having questions or concerns (77 %, 82 %). Some found the conversation confronting (17 %, 11 %), or felt it was too early in the illness trajectory (31 %, 26 %). Follow-up consultations were scheduled for 8 patients (17 %). Consultants were able to conduct the conversation as instructed (91 %), though 15 % indicated insufficient time for preparation.
CONCLUSION: Introductory conversations about palliative care at referral for palliative radiotherapy appear both acceptable and feasible, and may enhance timely integration of palliative care into oncology care for patients with bone metastases.