Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2025
The Views of People With Intellectual Disabilities About What Contributes Towards Optimal End-of-Life Care: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bebbington Corrina Alex, Croot Elizabeth
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disabilities face inequities in access to end-of-life care and inequalities in its quality and delivery. This review aimed to synthesise qualitative evidence to understand their own perspectives about what contributes to optimal end-of-life care.
METHODOLOGY: Data from 93 participants in five qualitative studies were thematically synthesised to identify optimal care and inform recommendations.
RESULTS: Four overarching and interrelated analytical themes were generated. (1) Optimal care recognises heterogeneity and is person-centred. It aligns with individuals' wishes and preferences which are established through 'active' communication. (2) This enables an individual's holistic support needs to be identified. (3) It fulfils ethical obligations around autonomy, equity and a person's 'right to know'. (4) It involves the necessary people to ensure all needs are met.
CONCLUSION: Optimal end-of-life care is person-centred, holistic, uses 'active' communication, meets ethical obligations and involves the necessary people in care.
METHODOLOGY: Data from 93 participants in five qualitative studies were thematically synthesised to identify optimal care and inform recommendations.
RESULTS: Four overarching and interrelated analytical themes were generated. (1) Optimal care recognises heterogeneity and is person-centred. It aligns with individuals' wishes and preferences which are established through 'active' communication. (2) This enables an individual's holistic support needs to be identified. (3) It fulfils ethical obligations around autonomy, equity and a person's 'right to know'. (4) It involves the necessary people to ensure all needs are met.
CONCLUSION: Optimal end-of-life care is person-centred, holistic, uses 'active' communication, meets ethical obligations and involves the necessary people in care.