DOI 10.1097/ms9.0000000000002316
Learning styles, approaches and academic performance of second and third-year medical students of a medical college of Kathmandu: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The research is based on a questionnaire to study the different learning styles among medical students, and their approach to intellectual development.
METHODS
This is an observational, cross-sectional study conducted on 140 participants. Initially after the informed consent process, the second-year and third-year medical students were requested to respond to the questionnaire without consulting friends. Data were analyzed descriptively and comparison was made.
RESULTS
In this study, the students were mostly visual learners, followed by solo learners, audio learners, verbal learners, and social learners. The majority of the students in our study (84.56%) studied less than 4 h per day beyond normal lecture hours. Similarly, 45.71% of students studied continuously for 30-60 min. During break, 63.57% of students used social media, watched television, and videos, and listened to music. Most students (75%) preferred to study in a hostel room and only 12.85% used the library as their study place. The majority of the students (65.71%) of students slept between six to eight hours. The University's suggested medical textbooks and reference materials were consulted by 94.3% of the students. The 47.85% of students favored self-directed learning with 56.42% preferring to read and write to retain the learned materials. Self-prepared notes were commonly used by the majority of students (60.7%).
CONCLUSIONS
This research evaluates the preferred learning preferences of medical students and their relationship to academic performance, which will improve the effectiveness of teaching and learning between teachers and medical students.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.