Prevalence of non-communicable diseases among household contacts of people with tuberculosis: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hamada Yohhei, Quartagno Matteo, Malik Farihah, Ntshamane Keolebogile, Tisler Anna, Gaikwad Sanjay, Acuna-Villaorduna Carlos, Bhavani Perumal Kannabiran, Alisjahbana Bachti, Ronacher Katharina, Apriani Lika, Becerra Mercedes, Chu Alexander L, Creswell Jacob, Diaz Gustavo, Ferro Beatriz E, Galea Jerome T, Grandjean Louis, Grewal Harleen M S, Gupta Amita, Jones-López Edward C, Kleynhans Léanie, Lecca Leonid, MacPherson Peter, Murray Megan, Marín Diana, Restrepo Blanca I, Shivakumar Shri Vijay Bala Yogendra, Shu Eileen, Sivakumaran Dhanasekaran, Vo Luan Nguyen Quang, Webb Emily L, Copas Andrew, Abubakar Ibrahim, Rangaka Molebogeng X
Аннотация
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. We searched Medline, Embase and the Global Index Medicus from inception to 16 May 2023. We included studies that assessed for at least one non-communicable disease among household contacts of people with clinical tuberculosis. We estimated the non-communicable disease prevalence through mixed effects logistic regression for studies providing individual participant data, and compared it with estimates from aggregated data meta-analyses. Furthermore, we compared age and sex-standardised non-communicable disease prevalence with national-level estimates standardised for age and sex.
RESULTS: We identified 39 eligible studies, of which 14 provided individual participant data (29,194 contacts). Of the remaining 25 studies, 18 studies reported aggregated data suitable for aggregated data meta-analysis. In individual participant data analysis, the pooled prevalence of diabetes in studies that undertook biochemical testing was 8.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1%-14.9%, four studies). Age-and sex-standardised prevalence was higher in two studies (10.4% vs. 6.9% and 11.5% vs. 8.4%) than the corresponding national estimates and similar in two studies. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus based on self-report or medical records was 3.4% (95% CI 2.6%-4.6%, 14 studies). Prevalence did not significantly differ compared to estimates from aggregated data meta-analysis. There were limited data for other non-communicable diseases.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus among household contacts was high while that of known diabetes was substantially lower, suggesting the underdiagnosis. tuberculosis household contact investigation offers opportunities to deliver multifaceted interventions to identify tuberculosis infection and disease, screen for non-communicable diseases and address shared risk factors.