MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7860/jcdr/2017/24590.9536

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017

Bladder Adenocarcinoma: A Persisting Diagnostic Dilemma.

Vasudevan Geetha, Bishnu Arijit, Singh Brij Mohan Kumar, Nayak Deepak M, Jain Pooja

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Primary urinary Bladder Adenocarcinoma (PBA) is an uncommon neoplasm and can cause diagnostic difficulties due to histologic similarities with adenocarcinomas of adjacent structures like Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT) and prostate, since involvement of the bladder by metastasis or direct spread can occur. Seven cases of bladder adenocarcinomas were diagnosed during a period of four years in a tertiary care hospital. Patient's age ranged from 26-78 years with a male predilection. Three cases were signet ring type adenocarcinomas, two cases were subtyped as enteric variant, one as mucinous variant and one as adenocarcinoma Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) variant. One case showed urachal involvement. Common site of involvement was the base and posterior wall of the bladder. Three cases had prior history of GIT malignancy. No morphologic difference was identified to differentiate primary from secondary adenocarcinomas. Bladder adenocarcinoma is rare tumours. Primary and secondary adenocarcinomas cannot be distinguished from each other on morphologic grounds. Ancillary studies may have limited role in distinguishing between the two. Hence, clinical correlation has a major role in their evaluation.

Для цитирования: Vasudevan Geetha, Bishnu Arijit, Singh Brij Mohan Kumar, Nayak Deepak M, Jain Pooja. Bladder Adenocarcinoma: A Persisting Diagnostic Dilemma.. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR. 2017. DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2017/24590.9536.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.