MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/adj.12465

Медицинская библиотека · Australian dental journal · 2017

Referral patterns of special needs patients at the Royal Dental Hospital of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Mohamed Rohani M, Calache H, Borromeo G L

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Special Needs Dentistry (SND) has been recognized as a dental specialty in Australia since 2003 but there have been no studies addressing the profile of patients for specialist care. The purpose of this study is to identify, via referrals received, the profile of patients and quality of referrals at the largest public SND unit in Victoria, Australia.

METHODS

All referrals received over a 6-month period (1 January-30 June 2013) by the integrated SND unit (ISNU) were reviewed prior to allocation to the outpatient clinic (OP), domiciliary (DOM) or general anaesthetic (GA) services.

RESULTS

Six-hundred and eighty-eight referrals were received with the majority for the OP clinic (68.3%), followed by DOM (22.4%) and GA services (9.3%) (χ2  = 360.2, P < 0.001). A referral may have specified more than one special needs condition with the most common category being those who were medically compromised (81.7%). The reasons for referral included lack of compliance (27.2%), further management due to multiple medical conditions or GA services required (9.9%), or for multiple other reasons (62.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

A diverse pattern of SND patients was referred to the ISNU with a majority of referrals having no specific referral reason cited, suggesting poor quality of referrals.

Для цитирования: Mohamed Rohani M, Calache H, Borromeo G L. Referral patterns of special needs patients at the Royal Dental Hospital of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.. Australian dental journal. 2017. DOI: 10.1111/adj.12465.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.