Clinical trials (London, England) · 2011
Alternatives to the standard Fleming, Harrington, and O'Brien futility boundary.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Anderson James R, High Robin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Phase III clinical trials comparing a standard treatment to a new therapy are often monitored for futility, that is, convincing evidence that the outcome of the new treatment is not as good as that specified by the alternative hypothesis. Fleming, Harrington, and O'Brien (FHOB) proposed a popular futility monitoring method, based upon repeated testing of the alternative hypothesis at some fixed p-value (often set at p = 0.005).
PURPOSE: To demonstrate several interesting properties of the boundary, and to suggest alternative boundaries on the null hypothesis normalized test statistic, which cross zero at 50% of the expected total information.
METHODS: The FHOB boundary is redefined as a boundary on the null hypothesis normalized test statistic and re-parameterized.
RESULTS: FHOB-type boundaries are shown to be a function only of the significance level and power of the primary test of hypothesis, and the p-value used for repeated testing of the alternative hypothesis. The boundary can be 'centered' (in the sense of crossing zero) at some fixed percentage of the expected total information and the rate at which the boundary increases is related to the significance level and power of the primary test of hypothesis.
LIMITATIONS: Other futility monitoring boundaries exist and have differing operating characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: The standard FHOB boundary, based upon repeated testing of the alternative hypothesis at p = 0.005 may be considered unnecessarily conservative in some settings and a monitoring boundary is proposed that is more likely to lead to a recommendation of futility when the null hypothesis is true.
PURPOSE: To demonstrate several interesting properties of the boundary, and to suggest alternative boundaries on the null hypothesis normalized test statistic, which cross zero at 50% of the expected total information.
METHODS: The FHOB boundary is redefined as a boundary on the null hypothesis normalized test statistic and re-parameterized.
RESULTS: FHOB-type boundaries are shown to be a function only of the significance level and power of the primary test of hypothesis, and the p-value used for repeated testing of the alternative hypothesis. The boundary can be 'centered' (in the sense of crossing zero) at some fixed percentage of the expected total information and the rate at which the boundary increases is related to the significance level and power of the primary test of hypothesis.
LIMITATIONS: Other futility monitoring boundaries exist and have differing operating characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: The standard FHOB boundary, based upon repeated testing of the alternative hypothesis at p = 0.005 may be considered unnecessarily conservative in some settings and a monitoring boundary is proposed that is more likely to lead to a recommendation of futility when the null hypothesis is true.