Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2008
Should we train the trainers? Results of a randomized trial.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Murphy Michael A, Neequaye Simon, Kreckler Simon, Hands Linda J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The development of efficient training methods in surgery is increasingly important. The effectiveness of training trainers is unclear. This study was designed to determine the effect on their trainees' performance of instructing trainers in a specific cognitive training method.
STUDY DESIGN: Ten trainers from a university teaching hospital were randomized to train novices on a one-to-one basis in a simulated procedure using either a four-step cognitive method or their own unspecified method. Thirty trainees were randomly assigned to either a cognitive or standard trainer. After training, trainees were assessed on performing the procedure using a task-specific checklist, a global rating scale, and time taken to complete the procedure.
RESULTS: Trainees who were trained using the specific cognitive method completed the procedure in a faster time (mean 331 seconds [SD 37 seconds] versus 426 seconds [SD 66 seconds]) and with higher global rating scores (mean 23.25 seconds [SD 3.7 seconds] versus 20.5 seconds [SD 4.5 seconds]) compared with those taught by a standard method.
CONCLUSIONS: Instructing trainers in a cognitive training method results in a significant improvement in training outcomes.
STUDY DESIGN: Ten trainers from a university teaching hospital were randomized to train novices on a one-to-one basis in a simulated procedure using either a four-step cognitive method or their own unspecified method. Thirty trainees were randomly assigned to either a cognitive or standard trainer. After training, trainees were assessed on performing the procedure using a task-specific checklist, a global rating scale, and time taken to complete the procedure.
RESULTS: Trainees who were trained using the specific cognitive method completed the procedure in a faster time (mean 331 seconds [SD 37 seconds] versus 426 seconds [SD 66 seconds]) and with higher global rating scores (mean 23.25 seconds [SD 3.7 seconds] versus 20.5 seconds [SD 4.5 seconds]) compared with those taught by a standard method.
CONCLUSIONS: Instructing trainers in a cognitive training method results in a significant improvement in training outcomes.