The Journal of rheumatology · 2008
Arthritis in Aboriginal Manitobans: evidence for a high burden of disease.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barnabe Cheryl, Elias Brenda, Bartlett Judith, Roos Leslie, Peschken Christine
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative burden of arthritis and patterns of care in Aboriginal Manitobans, using multiple data sets to ensure a representative picture.
METHODS: Arthritis burden and healthcare utilization was ascertained using 3 separate data sources. Physician claims for 3 common ICD-9 musculoskeletal diagnoses were abstracted from the Population Health Research Data Repository for First Nations (FN) Manitobans and compared to all other Manitobans. Self-reported arthritis rates were obtained from the Manitoba First Nations Regional Longitudinal Health Survey (MFN Survey), which surveyed FN persons living on-reserve. Data on ethnicity and diagnoses were abstracted from the Arthritis Centre research database, which contains records of all patients seen at the Arthritis Centre.
RESULTS: Twice as many FN Manitobans had physician claims for rheumatoid arthritis, degenerative arthritis, and unspecified arthropathy compared to all other Manitobans. MFN Survey data identified a self-reported arthritis rate of 21.0% and a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) rate of 3.0%. Data for 687 Aboriginal patients and 4135 Caucasian patients were abstracted from the Arthritis Centre database. Aboriginal patients seen in the Arthritis Centre were 2 to 4 times more likely to have a diagnosis of inflammatory disease, and less than half as likely to have noninflammatory disease.
CONCLUSION: The data highlight the increased burden of arthritis in Aboriginal Manitobans, and draw attention to large gaps in our knowledge of how, why, and when Aboriginals access medical care.
METHODS: Arthritis burden and healthcare utilization was ascertained using 3 separate data sources. Physician claims for 3 common ICD-9 musculoskeletal diagnoses were abstracted from the Population Health Research Data Repository for First Nations (FN) Manitobans and compared to all other Manitobans. Self-reported arthritis rates were obtained from the Manitoba First Nations Regional Longitudinal Health Survey (MFN Survey), which surveyed FN persons living on-reserve. Data on ethnicity and diagnoses were abstracted from the Arthritis Centre research database, which contains records of all patients seen at the Arthritis Centre.
RESULTS: Twice as many FN Manitobans had physician claims for rheumatoid arthritis, degenerative arthritis, and unspecified arthropathy compared to all other Manitobans. MFN Survey data identified a self-reported arthritis rate of 21.0% and a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) rate of 3.0%. Data for 687 Aboriginal patients and 4135 Caucasian patients were abstracted from the Arthritis Centre database. Aboriginal patients seen in the Arthritis Centre were 2 to 4 times more likely to have a diagnosis of inflammatory disease, and less than half as likely to have noninflammatory disease.
CONCLUSION: The data highlight the increased burden of arthritis in Aboriginal Manitobans, and draw attention to large gaps in our knowledge of how, why, and when Aboriginals access medical care.