Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) · 2021
Therapeutic apheresis and non-blood donor related apheresis current practices at various blood centres of healthcare organisations of India: A brief online survey.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kumawat Vijay, Tripathi Parmatma Prasad, Patidar Gopal Kumar
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To determine the variability in therapeutic apheresis (TA) and non-blood donor related apheresis practices, and the extent of expertise and knowledge of blood centre staff.
BACKGROUND: Apheresis activity that was earlier limited to therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and donor apheresis at few centres in India has seen remarkable surge involving many centres practising TA and non-blood donor related apheresis. The decentralised transfusion medicine practice in country has resulted in wide variability of knowledge and practice of TA. An online survey was conducted to achieve study objectives.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A 22 questionnaire survey was sent to the 215 blood centres through e-mail link focussing on three aspects; basic information of the participating centres, details of TA procedures and education and training levels of the staff.
RESULTS: Majority (71.9%) of centres were teaching institutions among analysed 57 centres. TPE (85.9%) and therapeutic cytapheresis (71.9%) were the most common TA procedures. The clinical haematology (68.4%) followed by neurology (64.9%) were the specialities utilising TA. The 64.9% centres used continuous flow cell separator and central venous access (52%) was preferred vascular access. A combination of normal saline, fresh frozen plasma and 5% albumin replacement fluid was first choice. Doctors involved in TA were trained in apheresis during their MD/DNB degree, but no structured training program existed for other category of staff.
CONCLUSION: There was a wide variability in TA practice in India and a dedicated training program for all categories of staff was emphasised by majority of participants.
BACKGROUND: Apheresis activity that was earlier limited to therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and donor apheresis at few centres in India has seen remarkable surge involving many centres practising TA and non-blood donor related apheresis. The decentralised transfusion medicine practice in country has resulted in wide variability of knowledge and practice of TA. An online survey was conducted to achieve study objectives.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A 22 questionnaire survey was sent to the 215 blood centres through e-mail link focussing on three aspects; basic information of the participating centres, details of TA procedures and education and training levels of the staff.
RESULTS: Majority (71.9%) of centres were teaching institutions among analysed 57 centres. TPE (85.9%) and therapeutic cytapheresis (71.9%) were the most common TA procedures. The clinical haematology (68.4%) followed by neurology (64.9%) were the specialities utilising TA. The 64.9% centres used continuous flow cell separator and central venous access (52%) was preferred vascular access. A combination of normal saline, fresh frozen plasma and 5% albumin replacement fluid was first choice. Doctors involved in TA were trained in apheresis during their MD/DNB degree, but no structured training program existed for other category of staff.
CONCLUSION: There was a wide variability in TA practice in India and a dedicated training program for all categories of staff was emphasised by majority of participants.