Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2015
A strategical re-thinking on National Blood Donor Pool: Anti-HBc positivity related re-entry mechanisms.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yilmaz Soner, Unlu Aytekin, Cetinkaya Riza Aytac, Yapar Mehmet, Avci Ismail Yasar, Yilmaz Sebahattin, Eyigun Can Polat
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Screening of blood donations for antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) is used to prevent transfusion transmitted hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. In this study, we studied the magnitude of blood donor gain by using a re-entry mechanism in our Blood Bank of Gulhane Military Academy of Medicine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January and May 2013, 5148 voluntary blood donors were screened by ELISA method for HBsAg, anti-HBc total and other screening markers, prospectively. Samples with repeated reactivity for the presence of anti-HBc were further tested with four supplemental assays.
RESULTS: We detected 515 (10%) anti-HBc positive and 4612 (90%) anti-HBc negative cases in 5127 HBsAg negative serum samples. A total of 461 (89.5%) blood units were reactive for at least one additional serologic parameter and 54 were (10.5%) negative. Isolated anti-HBc positivity rate was 1.3% (69/5127). In the isolated anti-HBc positive samples, 54 were also anti-HBe and HBeAg negative. HBV DNA was not detected in any of the samples.
CONCLUSION: Applying the EDQM criteria would decrease our blood donor loss from 10% to 5.4%. As alternative re-entry mechanisms have already been presented in the literature, institution of a new policy is needed to enhance the limited blood donor pool in our system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January and May 2013, 5148 voluntary blood donors were screened by ELISA method for HBsAg, anti-HBc total and other screening markers, prospectively. Samples with repeated reactivity for the presence of anti-HBc were further tested with four supplemental assays.
RESULTS: We detected 515 (10%) anti-HBc positive and 4612 (90%) anti-HBc negative cases in 5127 HBsAg negative serum samples. A total of 461 (89.5%) blood units were reactive for at least one additional serologic parameter and 54 were (10.5%) negative. Isolated anti-HBc positivity rate was 1.3% (69/5127). In the isolated anti-HBc positive samples, 54 were also anti-HBe and HBeAg negative. HBV DNA was not detected in any of the samples.
CONCLUSION: Applying the EDQM criteria would decrease our blood donor loss from 10% to 5.4%. As alternative re-entry mechanisms have already been presented in the literature, institution of a new policy is needed to enhance the limited blood donor pool in our system.