AIDS (London, England) · 1996
Estimated rate of HIV-1-infectious but seronegative blood donations in Bangkok, Thailand.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kitayaporn D, Kaewkungwal J, Bejrachandra S, Rungroung E, Chandanayingyong D, Mastro T D
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To determine HIV seroprevalence and incidence among various blood donor types, and to estimate the rate of window-period blood donations.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort from computerized donor records.
METHODS: Records were analysed from all 60,483 donors (contributing 97,464 donor units) at a public university teaching hospital blood bank in Bangkok, Thailand, from 1 January 1990 to 30 June 1993. Annual HIV incidence among 14,482 repeat donors who were HIV-seronegative on their first donation was calculated assuming equal probability of seroconversion between last seronegative and first seropositive donations. To estimate the probability of window-period donations, we assumed that the time from HIV infectivity to onset of detectable antibody was 45 days.
RESULTS: In 1990, HIV incidence calculated for all repeat donors was 307 per 100,000 person-years; the probability of a window-period donation was 38 in 100,000 donations or one in 2644 donations. During 1991-1993, this probability decreased by one-half. However, one-time donors were more than twice as likely as repeat donors to be HIV-1-seropositive.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of HIV window-period blood donations among Thai repeat donors was relatively high compared with that in developed countries and was probably even higher among one-time donors. Improved donor deferral criteria are needed in Thailand.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort from computerized donor records.
METHODS: Records were analysed from all 60,483 donors (contributing 97,464 donor units) at a public university teaching hospital blood bank in Bangkok, Thailand, from 1 January 1990 to 30 June 1993. Annual HIV incidence among 14,482 repeat donors who were HIV-seronegative on their first donation was calculated assuming equal probability of seroconversion between last seronegative and first seropositive donations. To estimate the probability of window-period donations, we assumed that the time from HIV infectivity to onset of detectable antibody was 45 days.
RESULTS: In 1990, HIV incidence calculated for all repeat donors was 307 per 100,000 person-years; the probability of a window-period donation was 38 in 100,000 donations or one in 2644 donations. During 1991-1993, this probability decreased by one-half. However, one-time donors were more than twice as likely as repeat donors to be HIV-1-seropositive.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of HIV window-period blood donations among Thai repeat donors was relatively high compared with that in developed countries and was probably even higher among one-time donors. Improved donor deferral criteria are needed in Thailand.