Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin · 1996
Intensification of donor interviewing procedures: a feasibility study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van Rhenen D J, Molijn M H, Gorgels J, van der Linden J M, Ko L K
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and acceptability for the blood donor of an intensified blood donor interviewing procedure on high-risk factors for infectious diseases. To answer the question whether an intensified blood donor interviewing procedure would lead to an unacceptable loss of blood donors.
DESIGN: Feasibility study.
SETTING: Red Cross Bloodbank Rotterdam. DONORS: Study group of 240 first-time donors.
INTERVENTIONS: Intensified donor interviewing techniques by direct questioning and workload assessment.
RESULTS: Intensified interviewing was welcomed by 88-91% of first-time donors and rejected by 2-5%. On the question whether the intensified interviewing procedure should be the standard approach of the blood bank the answer was positive in 76-82% of first-time donors and negative in 11-14%. No blood donors indicated that this would be a reason to withdraw from blood donation. The workload for the blood bank physician increased by approximately 30%.
CONCLUSION: The approach of intensified donor interviewing techniques in first-time donors is acceptable both to the donors and the blood bank workload.
DESIGN: Feasibility study.
SETTING: Red Cross Bloodbank Rotterdam. DONORS: Study group of 240 first-time donors.
INTERVENTIONS: Intensified donor interviewing techniques by direct questioning and workload assessment.
RESULTS: Intensified interviewing was welcomed by 88-91% of first-time donors and rejected by 2-5%. On the question whether the intensified interviewing procedure should be the standard approach of the blood bank the answer was positive in 76-82% of first-time donors and negative in 11-14%. No blood donors indicated that this would be a reason to withdraw from blood donation. The workload for the blood bank physician increased by approximately 30%.
CONCLUSION: The approach of intensified donor interviewing techniques in first-time donors is acceptable both to the donors and the blood bank workload.