MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/13696998.2019.1571499

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of medical economics · 2019

Lacosamide as a first-line treatment option in focal epilepsy: a cost-utility analysis for the Greek healthcare system.

Geitona Mary, Stamuli Eugena, Giannakodimos Stylianos, Kimiskidis Vasileios K, Kountouris Vasileios, Charokopou Mata, Christou Petros

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Epilepsy is the most common serious neurological disorder worldwide. Approximately 40% of patients with focal epileptic seizures remain uncontrolled with antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy or polytherapy. Lacosamide has been recently approved by the European Medicines Agency as monotherapy for the treatment of focal seizures. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of lacosamide compared with zonisamide as first-line treatment of focal epilepsy in patients with epilepsy aged ≥ 16 years to inform clinical decision-making in Greece.

METHODS

A discrete event simulation model was adapted to reflect treatment pathways and resource use within the Greek national healthcare system, as specified by clinical experts. The model captures time-varying events and patient characteristics. Clinical inputs were sourced from pivotal trials and a network meta-analysis comparing lacosamide with other AEDs. The model predicts disease progression and seizures, relevant and most common adverse events, withdrawal due to lack of efficacy or adverse events, and epilepsy-specific and all-cause mortality over a 2-year time horizon. Unit costs were retrieved from published Greek sources. Health outcomes were measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs); secondary outcome was the cost per seizure avoided. Robustness of the results was tested with univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The lacosamide treatment pathway was associated with higher costs (i.e. €1,064) and an additional 0.119 QALYs when compared with zonisamide, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €8,938 per QALY gained. The sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the results are most sensitive to the efficacy and utility estimates.

LIMITATIONS: There are a number of limitations which stem from the process of model adaptation and lack of local real-world evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Lacosamide is a cost-effective option at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000 per QALY, representing a valuable monotherapy treatment option for patients with focal epileptic seizures in the Greek setting.

Для цитирования: Geitona Mary, Stamuli Eugena, Giannakodimos Stylianos, Kimiskidis Vasileios K, Kountouris Vasileios, Charokopou Mata, Christou Petros. Lacosamide as a first-line treatment option in focal epilepsy: a cost-utility analysis for the Greek healthcare system.. Journal of medical economics. 2019. DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1571499.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.