Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2019
Reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects: Current procedures and perspectives.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Paré Arnaud, Bossard Adeline, Laure Boris, Weiss Pierre, Gauthier Olivier, Corre Pierre
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects remains a challenge for the reconstructive surgeon, from both a functional and an esthetic point of view.
METHODS: This clinical review examines the different techniques currently in use for mandibular reconstruction as related to a range of etiologies, including the different bone donor sites, the alternatives to free flaps (FFs), as well as the contribution of computer-assisted surgery. Recent progress and the perspectives in bone tissue engineering (BTE) are also discussed.
RESULTS: Osseous FF allows reliable and satisfying outcomes. However, locoregional flap, distraction osteogenesis, or even induced membrane techniques are other potential options in less favorable cases. Obtaining an engineered bone with satisfactory mechanical properties and sufficient vascular supply requires further investigations.
CONCLUSIONS: Osseous FF procedure remains the gold standard for segmental mandible reconstruction. BTE strategies offer promising alternatives.
METHODS: This clinical review examines the different techniques currently in use for mandibular reconstruction as related to a range of etiologies, including the different bone donor sites, the alternatives to free flaps (FFs), as well as the contribution of computer-assisted surgery. Recent progress and the perspectives in bone tissue engineering (BTE) are also discussed.
RESULTS: Osseous FF allows reliable and satisfying outcomes. However, locoregional flap, distraction osteogenesis, or even induced membrane techniques are other potential options in less favorable cases. Obtaining an engineered bone with satisfactory mechanical properties and sufficient vascular supply requires further investigations.
CONCLUSIONS: Osseous FF procedure remains the gold standard for segmental mandible reconstruction. BTE strategies offer promising alternatives.