Pharmacopsychiatry · 2016
Subjective Reasons for Non-Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in a Sample of Physicians in Outpatient Care.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gahr M, Eller J, Connemann B J, Schönfeldt-Lecuona C
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Drug safety surveillance strongly depends on the spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). A major limiting factor of spontaneous reporting systems is underreporting (UR) which describes incorrectly low reporting rates of ADRs. Factors contributing to UR are numerous and feature country-dependent differences. Understanding causes of and factors associated with UR is necessary to facilitate targeted interventions to improve ADR reporting and pharmacovigilance.
METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based telephone survey was performed among physicians in outpatient care in a federal state of Germany.
RESULTS: From n=316 eligible physicians n=176 completed the questionnaire (response rate=55.7%). Most of the physicians (n=137/77.8%) stated that they report ADRs which they have observed to the competent authority rarely (n=59/33.5%), very rarely (n=59/33.5%) or never (n=19/10.8%); the majority (n=123/69.9%) had not reported any ADRs in 2014. Frequent subjective reasons for non-reporting of ADR were (specified response options): lack of time (n=52/29.5%), the subjective evaluation that the required process of reporting is complicated (n=47/26.7%) or requires too much time (n=25/14.2%) or the assessment that reporting of an ADR is needless (n=22/12.5%); within open answers the participants frequently stated that they do not report ADRs that are already known (n=72/40.9%) and they only report severe ADRs (n=46/26.1%).
DISCUSSION: Our results suggest a need to inform physicians about pharmacovigilance and to modify the required procedure of ADR reporting or to offer other reporting options.
METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based telephone survey was performed among physicians in outpatient care in a federal state of Germany.
RESULTS: From n=316 eligible physicians n=176 completed the questionnaire (response rate=55.7%). Most of the physicians (n=137/77.8%) stated that they report ADRs which they have observed to the competent authority rarely (n=59/33.5%), very rarely (n=59/33.5%) or never (n=19/10.8%); the majority (n=123/69.9%) had not reported any ADRs in 2014. Frequent subjective reasons for non-reporting of ADR were (specified response options): lack of time (n=52/29.5%), the subjective evaluation that the required process of reporting is complicated (n=47/26.7%) or requires too much time (n=25/14.2%) or the assessment that reporting of an ADR is needless (n=22/12.5%); within open answers the participants frequently stated that they do not report ADRs that are already known (n=72/40.9%) and they only report severe ADRs (n=46/26.1%).
DISCUSSION: Our results suggest a need to inform physicians about pharmacovigilance and to modify the required procedure of ADR reporting or to offer other reporting options.