Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2015
The evolution of morphological variants of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a repeat biopsy-based observation.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhong Yongzhong, Xu Feng, Li Xiaomei, Chen Hao, Liang Shaoshan, Zhu Xiaodong, Liu Zhihong, Zeng Caihong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The Columbia classification employs a systematic, hierarchical approach to define five mutually exclusive variants. Studies have demonstrated differences in baseline clinical characteristics and outcomes among the Columbia classification variants. However, the evolution of the Columbia classification variants of primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is unclear. We assessed the evolution of morphological variants in FSGS based on repeat native renal biopsies.
METHODS: Twenty-four patients (18 male, 6 female) with idiopathic FSGS who underwent more than one renal biopsy were enrolled in this study; three of these patients underwent three renal biopsies. The patients' clinicopathological features were reviewed. The subtypes of FSGS (2004 Columbia classification) included the collapsing, tip, cellular, perihilar and not otherwise specified (NOS) variants. The evolution of the Columbia classification variants of primary FSGS in each patient was evaluated.
RESULTS: The interval between the first and second renal biopsy was 21.95 ± 24.33 months. No significant differences in laboratory data were noted between the first and second renal biopsy. At the first renal biopsy, 5 patients were classified with collapsing, 5 with tip, 6 with cellular, 2 with perihilar and 6 with NOS variants. At the second renal biopsy, 3 patients were classified with collapsing, 3 with tip lesion, 4 with cellular, 1 with perihilar and 13 with NOS variants. Subtype changes from the first to repeat biopsies occurred in 11 patients, 9 of which progressed from other variants to the NOS variant.
CONCLUSION: Repeat renal biopsies are a useful tool for observing FSGS histological changes. The transformation from other subtypes to the NOS variant was the most common change; these alterations were accompanied by clinical progression.
METHODS: Twenty-four patients (18 male, 6 female) with idiopathic FSGS who underwent more than one renal biopsy were enrolled in this study; three of these patients underwent three renal biopsies. The patients' clinicopathological features were reviewed. The subtypes of FSGS (2004 Columbia classification) included the collapsing, tip, cellular, perihilar and not otherwise specified (NOS) variants. The evolution of the Columbia classification variants of primary FSGS in each patient was evaluated.
RESULTS: The interval between the first and second renal biopsy was 21.95 ± 24.33 months. No significant differences in laboratory data were noted between the first and second renal biopsy. At the first renal biopsy, 5 patients were classified with collapsing, 5 with tip, 6 with cellular, 2 with perihilar and 6 with NOS variants. At the second renal biopsy, 3 patients were classified with collapsing, 3 with tip lesion, 4 with cellular, 1 with perihilar and 13 with NOS variants. Subtype changes from the first to repeat biopsies occurred in 11 patients, 9 of which progressed from other variants to the NOS variant.
CONCLUSION: Repeat renal biopsies are a useful tool for observing FSGS histological changes. The transformation from other subtypes to the NOS variant was the most common change; these alterations were accompanied by clinical progression.