The CUPID (Cultural and Psychosocial Influences on Disability) study: methods of data collection and characteristics of study sample.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Coggon David, Ntani Georgia, Palmer Keith T, Felli Vanda E, Harari Raul, Barrero Lope H, Felknor Sarah A, Gimeno David, Cattrell Anna, Serra Consol, Bonzini Matteo, Solidaki Eleni, Merisalu Eda, Habib Rima R, Sadeghian Farideh, Kadir Masood, Warnakulasuriya Sudath S P, Matsudaira Ko, Nyantumbu Busisiwe, Sim Malcolm R, Harcombe Helen, Cox Ken, Marziale Maria H, Sarquis Leila M, Harari Florencia, Freire Rocio, Harari Natalia, Monroy Magda V, Quintana Leonardo A, Rojas Marianela, Salazar Vega Eduardo J, Harris E Clare, Vargas-Prada Sergio, Martinez J Miguel, Delclos George, Benavides Fernando G, Carugno Michele, Ferrario Marco M, Pesatori Angela C, Chatzi Leda, Bitsios Panos, Kogevinas Manolis, Oha Kristel, Sirk Tuuli, Sadeghian Ali, Peiris-John Roshini J, Sathiakumar Nalini, Wickremasinghe A Rajitha, Yoshimura Noriko, Kielkowski Danuta, Kelsall Helen L, Hoe Victor C W, Urquhart Donna M, Derrett Sarah, McBride David, Gray Andrew
Аннотация
METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A standardised questionnaire covering musculoskeletal symptoms, disability and potential risk factors, was used to collect information from 47 samples of nurses, office workers, and other (mostly manual) workers in 18 countries from six continents. In addition, local investigators provided data on economic aspects of employment for each occupational group. Participation exceeded 80% in 33 of the 47 occupational groups, and after pre-specified exclusions, analysis was based on 12,426 subjects (92 to 1018 per occupational group). As expected, there was high usage of computer keyboards by office workers, while nurses had the highest prevalence of heavy manual lifting in all but one country. There was substantial heterogeneity between occupational groups in economic and psychosocial aspects of work; three- to five-fold variation in awareness of someone outside work with musculoskeletal pain; and more than ten-fold variation in the prevalence of adverse health beliefs about back and arm pain, and in awareness of terms such as "repetitive strain injury" (RSI).
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The large differences in psychosocial risk factors (including knowledge and beliefs about MSDs) between occupational groups should allow the study hypothesis to be addressed effectively.