MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/acm.0b013e31822a6e5d

Медицинская библиотека · Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2011

The relationship between direct observation, knowledge, and feedback: results of a national survey.

Mazor Kathleen M, Holtman Matthew C, Shchukin Yakov, Mee Janet, Katsufrakis Peter J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Multisource feedback can provide a comprehensive picture of a medical trainee's performance. The utility of a multisource feedback system could be undermined by lack of direct observation and accurate knowledge.

METHOD: The National Board of Medical Examiners conducted a national survey of medical students, interns, residents, chief residents, and fellows to learn the extent to which certain behaviors were observed, to examine beliefs about knowledge of each other's performance, and to assess feedback.

RESULTS

Increased direct observation is associated with the perception of more accurate knowledge, which is associated with increased feedback. Some evaluators provide feedback in the absence of accurate knowledge of a trainee's performance, and others who have accurate knowledge miss opportunities for feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct observation is a key component of an effective multisource feedback system. Medical educators and residency directors may be well advised to establish explicit criteria specifying a minimum number of observations for evaluations.

Для цитирования: Mazor Kathleen M, Holtman Matthew C, Shchukin Yakov, Mee Janet, Katsufrakis Peter J. The relationship between direct observation, knowledge, and feedback: results of a national survey.. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2011. DOI: 10.1097/acm.0b013e31822a6e5d.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.