Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2011
Suitability of the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes as a single primary endpoint for Alzheimer's disease trials.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Coley Nicola, Andrieu Sandrine, Jaros Mark, Weiner Michael, Cedarbaum Jesse, Vellas Bruno
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Clinical measures continue to be used as primary endpoints for disease-modifying trials for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Currently, two co-primary endpoints must be specified, which measure cognitive and functional impairments. Generally, the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) is one of the co-primary endpoints, but high variability in this measure results in large sample sizes. We evaluated the psychometric properties of the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) to assess its suitability as a single primary endpoint as an alternative to the traditional co-primary approach.
METHODS: Internal consistency, structural and convergent validity, and 2-year internal and external responsiveness of the CDR-SB were assessed in 667 very mild to moderate (global Clinical Dementia Rating, 0.5-2) AD patients from the REAL.FR (Réseau sur la Maladie d'Alzheimer Français) study.
RESULTS: The CDR-SB showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88), and acceptable structural (separate "cognitive" and "functional" factors) and convergent validity. Variability in mean changes over time was low, leading to excellent internal responsiveness (effect size = 1.2; standardized response mean = 1.17 at 2 years) and smaller sample sizes as compared with the ADAS-Cog. External responsiveness was acceptable when compared with "clinically meaningful" changes on the Activities of Daily Living scale but only borderline acceptable when compared with the ADAS-Cog and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. Levels of missing data and floor/ceiling effects were low.
CONCLUSIONS: The CDR-SB measures cognitive and functional impairment simultaneously, and has excellent 2-year internal responsiveness. This makes it a promising candidate as a sole primary endpoint for AD trials, although more work is required to determine the clinical relevance of CDR-SB changes, and its usefulness as an endpoint at other disease stages.
METHODS: Internal consistency, structural and convergent validity, and 2-year internal and external responsiveness of the CDR-SB were assessed in 667 very mild to moderate (global Clinical Dementia Rating, 0.5-2) AD patients from the REAL.FR (Réseau sur la Maladie d'Alzheimer Français) study.
RESULTS: The CDR-SB showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88), and acceptable structural (separate "cognitive" and "functional" factors) and convergent validity. Variability in mean changes over time was low, leading to excellent internal responsiveness (effect size = 1.2; standardized response mean = 1.17 at 2 years) and smaller sample sizes as compared with the ADAS-Cog. External responsiveness was acceptable when compared with "clinically meaningful" changes on the Activities of Daily Living scale but only borderline acceptable when compared with the ADAS-Cog and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. Levels of missing data and floor/ceiling effects were low.
CONCLUSIONS: The CDR-SB measures cognitive and functional impairment simultaneously, and has excellent 2-year internal responsiveness. This makes it a promising candidate as a sole primary endpoint for AD trials, although more work is required to determine the clinical relevance of CDR-SB changes, and its usefulness as an endpoint at other disease stages.