MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.100134

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2025

Artificial Intelligence in Renal Transplantation Over the Past Decade: A Narrative Review of Clinical Applications, Current Limitations, and Future Directions.

Anber Ahmed, Mohamed Youssef, Maleki Aryan, Atiq Sami, Radu Larisa, Omar Ibrahim, Sayed Abdelrahman

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This narrative review examines the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in kidney transplantation (KT) during the past 10 years, highlighting advancements in clinical applications and future potential. In pretransplant settings, AI algorithms assist in matching donors with recipients and predicting survival outcomes, aiming to reduce organ discard rates and improve allocation efficiency beyond traditional scoring systems like the Kidney Donor Profile Index. Surgical data science utilizes AI to enhance robotic surgery through augmented reality for real-time anatomical visualization and 3D printed models for preoperative planning. Furthermore, ML is applied to assess organ quality during normothermic machine perfusion. Regarding post-transplant outcomes, artificial neural networks have demonstrated superior accuracy in predicting graft survival and rejection compared to conventional statistical methods. Despite these advancements, clinical application is hindered by limitations such as overfitting, selection bias from single-center data, and a lack of external validation.

Для цитирования: Anber Ahmed, Mohamed Youssef, Maleki Aryan, Atiq Sami, Radu Larisa, Omar Ibrahim, Sayed Abdelrahman. Artificial Intelligence in Renal Transplantation Over the Past Decade: A Narrative Review of Clinical Applications, Current Limitations, and Future Directions.. Cureus. 2025. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.100134.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.