Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2024
Live-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction (L-TOP) using artificial intelligence.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ali Hatem, Mohammed Mahmoud, Molnar Miklos Z, Fülöp Tibor, Burke Bernard, Shroff Sunil, Shroff Arun, Briggs David, Krishnan Nithya
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Outcome prediction for live-donor kidney transplantation improves clinical and patient decisions and donor selection. However, the currently used models are of limited discriminative or calibration power and there is a critical need to improve the selection process. We aimed to assess the value of various artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to improve the risk stratification index.
METHODS: We evaluated pre-transplant variables among 66 914 live-donor kidney transplants (performed between 1 December 2007 and 1 June 2021) from the United Network of Organ Sharing database, randomized into training (80%) and test (20%) sets. The primary outcome measure was death-censored graft survival. We tested four machine learning models for discrimination [time-dependent concordance index (CTD) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)] and calibration [integrated Brier score (IBS)]. We used decision-curve analysis to assess the potential clinical utility.
RESULTS: Among the models, the deep Cox mixture model showed the best discriminative performance (AUC = 0.70, 0.68 and 0.68 at 5, 10 and 13 years post-transplant, respectively). CTD reached 0.70, 0.67 and 0.66 at 5, 10 and 13 years post-transplant. The IBS score was 0.09, indicating good calibration. In comparison, applying the Living Kidney Donor Profile Index (LKDPI) on the same cohort produced a CTD of 0.56 and an AUC of 0.55-0.58 only. Decision-curve analysis showed an additional net benefit compared with the LKDPI 'treat all' and 'treat none' approaches.
CONCLUSION: Our AI-based deep Cox mixture model, termed Live-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction, outperforms existing prediction models, including the LKDPI, with the potential to improve decisions for optimum live-donor selection by ranking potential transplant pairs based on graft survival. This model could be adopted to improve the outcomes of paired exchange programs.
METHODS: We evaluated pre-transplant variables among 66 914 live-donor kidney transplants (performed between 1 December 2007 and 1 June 2021) from the United Network of Organ Sharing database, randomized into training (80%) and test (20%) sets. The primary outcome measure was death-censored graft survival. We tested four machine learning models for discrimination [time-dependent concordance index (CTD) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)] and calibration [integrated Brier score (IBS)]. We used decision-curve analysis to assess the potential clinical utility.
RESULTS: Among the models, the deep Cox mixture model showed the best discriminative performance (AUC = 0.70, 0.68 and 0.68 at 5, 10 and 13 years post-transplant, respectively). CTD reached 0.70, 0.67 and 0.66 at 5, 10 and 13 years post-transplant. The IBS score was 0.09, indicating good calibration. In comparison, applying the Living Kidney Donor Profile Index (LKDPI) on the same cohort produced a CTD of 0.56 and an AUC of 0.55-0.58 only. Decision-curve analysis showed an additional net benefit compared with the LKDPI 'treat all' and 'treat none' approaches.
CONCLUSION: Our AI-based deep Cox mixture model, termed Live-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction, outperforms existing prediction models, including the LKDPI, with the potential to improve decisions for optimum live-donor selection by ranking potential transplant pairs based on graft survival. This model could be adopted to improve the outcomes of paired exchange programs.