Psychosomatic medicine · 2003
Association between the type 4 dopamine receptor gene polymorphism and novelty seeking.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Keltikangas-Järvinen Liisa, Elovainio Marko, Kivimäki Mika, Lichtermann Dirk, Ekelund Jesper, Peltonen Leena
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Mixed results have been reported on the association between the type 4 dopamine receptor gene (DRD4) and the temperament dimension of novelty seeking. We tested this association by specifying the analysis to components of novelty seeking.
METHODS: Participants were 150 high and low novelty-seeking scorers (the highest and lowest 10%) from a randomized, population-based sample of Finnish citizens in six age cohorts. We genotyped a 48-bp repeat polymorphism in the DRD4 gene. Novelty seeking was assessed by the Temperament and Character Inventory.
RESULTS: No difference in overall novelty seeking between individuals with no seven-repeat allele (short) and any seven-repeat allele (long), between the 4,4 and 4,7 genotype groups, and between long (l/l and s/l) and short (s/s) polymorphism groups were found. The odds ratio for high overall novelty seeking in the presence of any two- or five-repeated alleles vs. none was 2.41 (95% CI, 1.11-5.20). Corresponding odds ratios were significant for exploratory excitability (2.94; 95% CI, 1.32-6.59) and impulsiveness (2.74; 95% CI, 1.23-6.11) but not for other components of novelty seeking. No interactions with age or gender were detected.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirmed previous findings on the association between the type 4 dopamine receptor gene and novelty seeking, in particular exploratory excitability and impulsiveness. The tendency to avoid or approach a novel situation is a core concept of several temperamental theories. The present findings support the hypothesis that this tendency is associated with DRD4 and might concern temperament psychology in general, not only the concept of novelty seeking.
METHODS: Participants were 150 high and low novelty-seeking scorers (the highest and lowest 10%) from a randomized, population-based sample of Finnish citizens in six age cohorts. We genotyped a 48-bp repeat polymorphism in the DRD4 gene. Novelty seeking was assessed by the Temperament and Character Inventory.
RESULTS: No difference in overall novelty seeking between individuals with no seven-repeat allele (short) and any seven-repeat allele (long), between the 4,4 and 4,7 genotype groups, and between long (l/l and s/l) and short (s/s) polymorphism groups were found. The odds ratio for high overall novelty seeking in the presence of any two- or five-repeated alleles vs. none was 2.41 (95% CI, 1.11-5.20). Corresponding odds ratios were significant for exploratory excitability (2.94; 95% CI, 1.32-6.59) and impulsiveness (2.74; 95% CI, 1.23-6.11) but not for other components of novelty seeking. No interactions with age or gender were detected.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirmed previous findings on the association between the type 4 dopamine receptor gene and novelty seeking, in particular exploratory excitability and impulsiveness. The tendency to avoid or approach a novel situation is a core concept of several temperamental theories. The present findings support the hypothesis that this tendency is associated with DRD4 and might concern temperament psychology in general, not only the concept of novelty seeking.